Christine Reynier

Catherine Bernard

"The Waves" by Virginia Woolf

Jean-Michel Ganteau

Impersonality and Emotion in Twentieth-century British Literature

Bénédicte Coste

Catherine Delyfer

Charting the period that extends from the 1860s to the 1940s, this volume offers fresh perspectives on Aestheticism and Modernism. By acknowledging that both movements had a passion for the ‘new’, it goes beyond the alleged divide between Modernism and its predecessors. Rather than reading the modernist credo, ‘Make it New!’, as a desire to break away from the past, the authors of this book suggest reading it as a continuation and a reappropriation of the spirit of the ‘New’ that characterizes Aestheticism. Basing their arguments on recent reassessments of Aestheticism and Modernism and their articulation, contributors take up the challenge of interrogating the connections, continuities, and intersections between the two movements, thus revealing the working processes of cultural and aesthetic change so as to reassess the value of the new for each. Attending to well-known writers such as Waugh, Woolf, Richardson, Eliot, Pound, Ford, Symons, Wilde, and Hopkins, as well as to hitherto neglected figures such as Lucas Malet, L.S. Gibbon, Leonard Woolf, or George Egerton, they revise assumptions about Aestheticism and Modernism and their very definitions. This collection brings together international scholars specializing in Aestheticism or Modernism who push their analyses beyond their strict period of expertise and take both movements into account through exciting approaches that borrow from aesthetics, philosophy, or economics. The volume proposes a corrective to the traditional narratives of the history of Aestheticism and Modernism, revitalizing definitions of these movements and revealing new directions in aestheticist and modernist studies.

Continuities, Revisions, Speculations

Reconnecting Aestheticism and Modernism

Various art forms inscribe, program or perform the preference of relationship. In so doing, they put otherness high on their aesthetic agenda by caring about the cultural other, the other of gender, race, class or history. Such art forms from different periods promote a mode of sensibility to the other, whether the foreign or the invisible, or both, in their various manifestations. Sensibility to otherness is envisaged through the means of strident or humble art-forms and aesthetic choices, from the overtly experimental, to subdued adaptation. In confronting and welcoming the other art object, the other culture, or the othered citizen, art objects to the tyranny of the same and promotes such values as attentiveness, responsiveness and responsibility to forms of otherness, i.e. to the ways in which art cares about, or even takes care of the other. This implies the practice of an ethic of alterity (as distinct from the formulation of general rules) that is accountable for making the spectator or listener pay attention to social, economic and cultural invisibilities. Such an ethic of alterity joins hands with the political and may help chart the evolution of the objects and forms of engagement from the Victorian period to the present.

Ethics of Alterity Confrontation in the 19th- 21st- Century British Arts

In the mid-twentieth century, Virginia Woolf published ‘Six Articles on London Life’ in Good Housekeeping magazine, a popular magazine where fashion, cookery and house decoration is largely featured. This first book-length study of what Woolf calls ‘little articles’ proposes to reassess the commissioned essays and read them in a chronological sequence in their original context as well as in the larger context of Woolf’s work. Drawing primarily on literary theory, intermedial studies, periodical studies and philosophy, this volume argues the essays which provided an original guided tour of London are creative and innovative works, combining several art forms while developing a photographic method. Further investigation examines the construct of Woolf’s essays as intermedial and as partaking both of theory and praxis; intermediality is closely connected here with her defense of a democratic ideal, itself grounded in a dialogue with her forebears. Far from being second-rate, the Good Housekeeping essays bring together aesthetic and political concerns and come out as playing a pivotal role: they redefine the essay as intermedial, signal Woolf’s turn to a more openly committed form of writing, and fit perfectly within Woolf’s essayistic and fictional oeuvre which they in turn illuminate.

Virginia Woolf’s Good Housekeeping Essays

Le rôle majeur joué par Virginia Woolf dans la littérature anglaise des années vingt et trente n'est plus à démontrer. On sait combien Mrs Dalloway, La Promenade au phare, Les Vagues, contribuèrent à faire émerger une écriture de la modernité, une langue mouvante, habile, suspendue à la frontière de la prose et de la poésie, lovée au plus intime de la conscience. Dans l'ombre de ces romans, le reste de son œuvre foisonnante reste encore mal connu. Les écrits politiques de Woolf, ses nouvelles, ses essais, sa correspondance permettent cependant de voir un imaginaire littéraire et politique à l'œuvre. De même, alors que la critique tendit précédemment à privilégier les enjeux formels et phénoménologiques de l'écriture poétique de Woolf, des études récentes ont exploré ses liens avec son contexte épistémologique et politique, les échos intertextuels ou inter-esthétiques qui s'y font entendre. Le volume d'articles réunis ici se propose de faire le point sur ces perspectives formelles et théoriques. Il est le fruit des travaux du Colloque de Cerisy qui se tint en 2001 sur l'œuvre de la romancière. En choisissant d'interroger les notions de « pur » et d'« impur » – notions qui font souvent retour sous la plume de la romancière – les auteurs proposent d'ouvrir un dialogue entre les textes les plus canoniques et le reste de l'œuvre jugé longtemps mineur ou « impur » mais aussi entre des approches critiques multiples (génétique, psychanalyse, épistémologie... ), toutes mises au défi par un univers littéraire paradoxal qui résiste à la synthèse et à la clôture.

Christine Reynier

About

Books

Join the club