Constance Black Garnett

Fyodor Dostoevsky

Determined to overreach his humanity and assert his untrammelled individual will, Raskolnikov, an impoverished student living in the St. Petersburg of the Tsars, commits an act of murder and theft and sets into motion a story which, for its excrutiating suspense, its atmospheric vividness, and its profundity of characterization and vision, is almost unequaled in the literatures of the world. The best known of Dostoevsky's masterpieces, Crime and Punishment can bear any amount of rereading without losing a drop of its power over our imagination.

Crime and Punishment

Raskolnikov, a destitute and desperate former student, wanders through the slums of St Petersburg and commits a random murder without remorse or regret. He imagines himself to be a great man, a Napoleon: acting for a higher purpose beyond conventional moral law. But as he embarks on a dangerous game of cat and mouse with a suspicious police investigator, Raskolnikov is pursued by the growing voice of his conscience and finds the noose of his own guilt tightening around his neck. Only Sonya, a downtrodden prostitute, can offer the chance of redemption.
This vivid translation by David McDuff has been acclaimed as the most accessible version of Dostoyevsky’s great novel, rendering its dialogue with a unique force and naturalism. This edition also includes a new chronology of Dostoyevsky’s life and work.

(Maybe Malick had this in mind - tree of life trailer)

Zeke Taylor

“‘…and we shall fall at His feet and weep, and we shall understand all things.’”

Фёдор Михайлович Достоевский

Priscilla Meyer

Constance Garnett (translator)

Nicholas Rice

Juliya Salkovskaya

the man who has a conscience suffers whilst acknowledging his sin. that is his punishment.

juana de arco si estuviera cronicamente online

If once a girl’s heart is moved to pity, it’s more dangerous than anything.

anet

Honoured sir,' he began almost with Solemnity, poverty is not a vice, that's a true saying. Yet I know too that drunkenness is not a virtue, and that that's even truer. But beggary, honoured sir, beggary is a vice. In poverty you may still retain your innate nobility of soul, but in beggary - never - no one. 

Do you understand, sir, do you understand what it means when you have absolutely nowhere to turn?' Marmeladov's question came suddenly into his mind, for every man must have somewhere to turn'

Crime and punishment

“He was so immersed in himself and had isolated himself so much from everyone that he was afraid not only of meeting his landlady but of meeting anyone at all”

Duška

And when the heart of a young woman experiences pity for someone, then, naturally, that's the most dangerous thing for her. She conceives at once a desire 'to save' him,

TRANSLATED BY RICHARD PEVEAR AND LARISSA VOLOKHONSKY Consumed by the idea of his own special destiny, immured in poverty and deprivation, Rashkolnikov is drawn to commit a terrible crime. In the aftermath, Rashkolnikov is dogged by madness, guilt and a calculating detective, and a feverish cat-and-mouse game unfolds. The only hope for redemption, if Rashkolnikov can but recognise it, lies in the virtuous and faithful Sonya. The Vintage Classic Russians Series- Published for the 100th anniversary of the 1917 Russian Revolution, these are must-have, beautifully designed editions of six epic masterpieces that have survived controversy, censorship and suppression to influence decades of thought and artistic expression.

Crime and Punishment (Vintage Classic Russians Series)

‘Where was it,’ Raskolnikov thought as he walked on, ‘where was it that I read about a man condemned to death saying or thinking, an hour before his death, that if he had to live somewhere high up on a cliffside, on a ledge so narrow that there was room only for his two feet—and with the abyss, the ocean, eternal darkness, eternal solitude, eternal storm all around him—and had to stay like that, on a square foot of space, an entire lifetime, a thousand years, an eternity—it would be better to live so than to die right now! Only to live, to live, to live! To live, no matter how—only to live!

Rodion Romanovitch Raskolnikov, a brilliant yet conflicted student lives in a rented room of a run-down apartment in St. Petersburg. Extremely handsome, proud and intelligent, Raskolnikov devises a peculiar theory about ?intelligent? men being above law.To execute his theory, he contemplates committing a crime. He murders a cynical and an unscrupulous pawnbroker named Alyona Ivanovna and her sister Lizaveta.The act compels Raskolnikov to negotiate and reconcile with his own moral dilemmas.Fyodor Dostoevsky?s incisive psychological analysis of his protagonist goes beyond Raskolnikov?s criminal act and covers his perilous journey from suffering to redemption.First published in The Russian Messenger in monthly instalments during 1866, Crime and Punishment, Dostoevsky?s second novel following his return from exile in Siberia, is a powerful revelation of the human condition. Is crime acceptable in the pursuit of a higher purpose.

akshita

In a timeless story of justice, morality, and redemption, an impoverished Russian student murders a miserly landlady, a crime that has severe repercussions on his life and his family as he battles his conscience.

Katia :)

Oh, if someone were to ask what my favourite books are, I would mention this one on my long list, though embarrassed how basic my taste may come accross. But it’s fine. This book is so loved for a reason. You must read it. Easy to read, full of twists and will make you root for a killer.

Iuno <3

A remarkable masterpiece of Dostoyevsky in the world of Russian's fiction. It captivates the crime and psychological tensions of life. It is a tragic tale of a protagonist Raskolnikov, who puts his philosophical theories to the trial of murder eventually. He is incapable to understand the feelings of love and commiseration because he regards himself as a pariah. Mesmerizing!

Easyread Edition

danakim

Louisa

A book about ambiguity in everything. Shoving the intricate mess that is humanity onto the reader's face and proudly implying every single step of the way that it's indecipherable.

Featured title in the 2018 PBS Great American Reads Living in a squalid room in St. Petersburg, the indigent but proud Rodion Raskolnikov believes he is above society. Obsessed with the idea of breaking the law, Raskolnikov resolves to kill an old pawnbroker for her cash. Although the murder and robbery are bungled, Raskolnikov manages to escape without being seen. And with nothing to prove his guilt and a mendacious confessor in police custody, Raskolnikov seems to have committed the perfect crime. But in Fyodor Dostoyevsky's world of moral transgressions, with its reason and its consequences, Raskolnikov's plan has a devastating hitch: the feverish delirium of his own conscience. AmazonClassics brings you timeless works from the masters of storytelling. Ideal for anyone who wants to read a great work for the first time or rediscover an old favorite, these new editions open the door to literature's most unforgettable characters and beloved worlds.

Crime and Punishment (Amazonclassics Edition)

I’ve always loved the way Dostoevsky refers to dreams as reflections of real life. Dreams can also stand as signs or beckonings that shouldn’t be taken lightly, especially for his characters. I now believe Dostoevsky himself resonated with the link between life and dreams based on his personal experiences.

I can feel how tremendous suffering is something we can’t avoid, and in the book, this is most evident in the dilemma and torment Raskolnikov unfolds.

 maintains a flowing pace and immaculate thrill, especially in the climax chapters. I cannot help but compare it to 

. While the latter delves into spiritual and religious values towards life—something that everyone may scarcely understand—

takes life in the most humane way. It explores our evil deeds, unthinkable contempt for the world or others, our deepest fears, and the sins that accompany us throughout life. Both novels share similar sentiments regarding sorrow, human nature, and redemption, which makes me believe Dostoevsky remains superior compared to other authors. He intertwines spirituality with philosophy, and reading his works never fails to make me feel as though I’ve had a religious experience. The epilogue surely holds some impact, and now I am grief-stricken having to part with such amazing characters and story.

🏹

I’ve always loved the way Dostoevsky refers to dreams as reflections of real life. Dreams can also stand as signs or beckonings that shouldn’t be taken lightly, especially for his characters. I now believe Dostoevsky himself resonated with the link between life and dreams based on his personal experiences.


In a morbid condition of the brain, dreams often have a singular actuality, vividness, and extraordinary semblance of reality. At times monstrous images are created, but the setting and the whole picture are so truth-like and filled with details so delicate, so unexpectedly, but so artistically consistent, that the dreamer, were he an artist like Pushkin or Turgenev even, could never have invented them in the waking state. Such sick dreams always remain long in the memory and make a powerful impression on the overwrought and deranged nervous system.

I can feel how tremendous suffering is something we can’t avoid, and in the book, this is most evident in the dilemma and torment Raskolnikov unfolds.


Crime and Punishment maintains a flowing pace and immaculate thrill, especially in the climax chapters. I cannot help but compare it to The Brothers Karamazov. While the latter delves into spiritual and religious values towards life—something that everyone may scarcely understand—Crime and Punishment takes life in the most humane way. It explores our evil deeds, unthinkable contempt for the world or others, our deepest fears, and the sins that accompany us throughout life. Both novels share similar sentiments regarding sorrow, human nature, and redemption, which makes me believe Dostoevsky remains superior compared to other authors. He intertwines spirituality with philosophy, and reading his works never fails to make me feel as though I’ve had a religious experience. The epilogue surely holds some impact, and now I am grief-stricken having to part with such amazing characters and story.

Erik Craigo

Crimen y castigo

It was a bit dense sometimes because all the characters tend to divagate to much when taking, but it's really beautiful and intense.

LIMEKI 

A. D. Knapp

Definitely need to read a hard copy of this. I felt like I missed a lot listening to the audiobook version. Sometimes you need to re-read a section to fully appreciate it. Just can't do that with your ears.

Crime And Punishment

Reiza H

Apa yang menjadikan sebuah kejahatan dipandang sebagai kejahatan?

Meet Raskolnikov. Mahasiswa ngabers dengan pandangan ideologi yang “kiri-kiri kere.” Belakangan, ia gelisah karena merasa hidupnya tidak mengarah ke hal yang baik dan ia merasa stuck dengan kehidupannya. Perkuliahannya tidak beres dan ia dikeluarkan dari kampusnya. Masa depan terlihat gloomy baginya.

Semuanya berubah ketika ia memutuskan untuk melakukan sesuatu yang ia yakini mampu menyelamatkan berpuluh-puluh orang dari jerat kemiskinan sekaligus mampu membawa dirinya ke tingkatan orang-orang besar: Ia membunuh seorang wanita tua lintah darat, Alyona Ivanovna beserta adiknya yang kebetulan apes, Lizaveta.

Ia menganggap dirinya pahlawan karena sudah membunuh wanita tua yang ia sebut sebagai “kutu” namun, pelan-pelan, kegelisahan dan kekhawatirannya akan peristiwa ganjil yang ia lakukan tersebut mulai menghantuinya dan mempengaruhi orang-orang di sekitarnya. Ia pun mulai terobsesi bermain kucing-kucingan bersama para polisi dan temannya sendiri. Sementara kita sebagai pembaca, akan dibuat gemas melihat perlakuan dan obrolan-obrolan yang Raskolnikov lakukan dengan orang-orang di sekitarnya.

Akankah Raskolnikov lolos dari jeratan hukuman?

Its such a stroke of luck to read it for the first time at 23. The same age as Raskolnikov

Isabella

Molly M

how fabulous omg. i have nothing intelligent to say lol i loved it

Indulgent far too much for my likings at some moments; however the writing of neuroticism is great. Ideological caricatures often failed to fully capture my attention

Clay Carey

engrossing stories cobbled into a less than perfect criticism of revolution

Jeremiah Cha

Maximus

Here we find ourselves in 1860's during a hot summer in St. Petersburg, a city of bedlam engulfed with poverty, drunkards, and dissolute bureaucrats. The story focuses on a young man by the name of Rodion Raskolnikov (or should I say "Rascal"nikov). A brainy former student who was expelled from university, lives in squalor and finds himself relying upon the services of an old and decrepit pawnbroker in an attempt to make ends meet. Motivated by anger and a personal sense of injustice, he sees fit to murder the elderly pawnbroker in the hopes of stealing her valuables to make a better life for himself and his family. The outcome is that while no-one seemingly suspects him of murder, he is plagued with a deep feeling of alientation from society, illness and a tormented heart.

I found the book to be a little dense and challenging, but in a good way. It was highly educational and certainly worth the effort. The story was great. I also wanted to mention how impactful the epilogue was.

I found that this book offers a multitude of insightful scopes, including but not limited to the complexities that surround personal opinions on justification and morality, the difficulty and importance of retaining emotional balance, especially in the most challenging of times, the ramifications of one's self-imposed pseudo-submergence into Nihilism, the conflicts that exist between society and the individual ("ordinary vs. extraordinary") and what devastating results can ensue from the triad of illness, narcissism and poverty-stricken desperation.

This novel has solidified my apprectiation for Dostoevsky, his artistry and a new-found interest to immerse myself in more of his works. 

It reminds me a little of A Happy Death by Albert Camus, but significantly better.

jack

i cried about 5 times throughout this book. goddamn! definitely going to have to read some more dostoevsky. i enjoyed essentially everything about this book. gonna have to go back and reread a couple sections just to Feel them again.

This guy could benefit from some 21st century mental health care

sophie <3

Fyodor

In this classic work, Dostoyevsky creates an intimacy that is claustrophobic, full of tension, and as haunting and relentless as a love affair. Begun as a novel concerned with the psychology of a crime and the processes of guilt, it surpasses itself to take on the tragic force of myth.

hileahrious

I have great trouble accepting this as one of the greatest literary works of all time… perhaps of ITS time, but by no means did it leave me speechless or reeling as other novels I’ve enjoyed. Maybe it’s not my style… it didn’t evoke much of anything within me?

I will say, it is absolute good fun. It is not without drama, and the anti-hero is beautifully depicted through Raskolnikoff’s character and the journey through his mind is hilarious yet frustrating. There is this feeling of agony throughout the entire book of not knowing entirely what is going on, which I’m not sure is on purpose but either way I think it very much accompanies the attitudes and thoughts a person might suffer upon killing another.

At one point toward the beginning I jotted down “a hilarious description of depression” and to then see how that mental state evolves into murder and mania was (darkly) entertaining. 

It is of course extremely well-written and psychologically detailed, but also wildly unreasonable and choppy in terms of other character development and setting, and as a visual reader that was a bit annoying for me. Still, I was never bored per se… I had a similar sensation when reading Tolstoy, so maybe this is the art of great Russian writers.

lexie

Ziggy

do NOT buy the clearance ideologies off shein

I can’t even complain about the struggles I may have had with this book because my god isn’t it just a gorgeous masterpiece? Truly Fydor Dovestky was an author ahead of his time. 

We follow “Rodion”, and his conflicting life of morality, moral depravity and unequal life. it begins with him wallowing in a life of pity, of shame, of illness and of poverty. We see the peaks and crests of his life, allowing us to relate it to our own lives, making this novel utterly timeless. I love it. Could might as well be one of my favourite classics and favourite novels of all time.

I struggled with names and also with following the plot, so I’m most probably going to follow this story up with act summaries and explanations. But for a Novel of age and also from Russia, a little confusion had to be expected. 

Pick it up. Start it. It’s fine if it takes a while to read, because when it lifts off, you’ll enjoy it in its entirety; difficult names and all. 

surtified™

I can’t even complain about the struggles I may have had with this book because my god isn’t it just a gorgeous masterpiece? Truly Fydor Dovestky was an author ahead of his time. 

We follow “Rodion”, and his conflicting life of morality, moral depravity and unequal life. it begins with him wallowing in a life of pity, of shame, of illness and of poverty. We see the peaks and crests of his life, allowing us to relate it to our own lives, making this novel utterly timeless. I love it. Could might as well be one of my favourite classics and favourite novels of all time.

I struggled with names and also with following the plot, so I’m most probably going to follow this story up with act summaries and explanations. But for a Novel of age and also from Russia, a little confusion had to be expected. 

Pick it up. Start it. It’s fine if it takes a while to read, because when it lifts off, you’ll enjoy it in its entirety; difficult names and all. 

I'm finally done reading this book. Since I don't have much free time I would read this book sometimes during morning coffee. We did analyse this book in school, but, oh well, it did not prepare me for what happened. Book has many interesting stuff aside the main point. I would read it again and I'm looking forward to reading more books written by F.D.. Also I know book is written during realism but why is every young woman described like a little child?

melanie 

A few words about Dostoevsky himself may help the English reader to understand his work. Dostoevsky was the son of a doctor. His parents were very hard-working and deeply religious people, but so poor that they lived with their five children in only two rooms. The father and mother spent their evenings in reading aloud to their children, generally from books of a serious character. Though always sickly and delicate Dostoevsky came out third in the final examination of the Petersburg school of Engineering. There he had already begun his first work, “Poor Folk.” This story was published by the poet Nekrassov in his review and was received with acclamations. The shy, unknown youth found himself instantly something of a celebrity. A brilliant and successful career seemed to open before him, but those hopes were soon dashed. In 1849 he was arrested.

Benedict Neo

My first ever Dostoyevsky book. Reading his books is truly something else. The beginning to me was pretty hard to follow, with characters popping up from all corners. But I really enjoyed peering into the psychology of Raskolnikov, and experiencing the dichotomy between his pre-murder self, and post-murder self. 

What this book really taught me was the danger of ideologies, and how applying rationality and adhering to philosophical thoughts like Utilitarianism, although seems rational in thought experiments, is highly unrealistic and just doesn't work in the real world. 

Throughout the novel I felt sympathy for Raskolnikov, while knowing he was a stone-cold killer who murdered two innocent women, his overall life condition was terrible and was under an ailment. However, it did not justify killing and I find the consequences of his action and what happened to him in the end fair and just. I really liked the ending, and I can't wait to read more of Dostoyevsky's work, especially the The Brothers Karamazov.

After a month I have finally finished my first ever Dostoevsky!!! 

There is absolutely no need for a review of this book at all however I will give my very brief "take" and reading experience of this piece of literature. (aka a word & thought dump because I simply cannot put it all cohesively together this soon after finishing)

I think its really important to note that the way this story was published was in parts, serialized format, and Dostoevsky loves a cliffhanger. (so expect long long chapters) 

The nature of morality. Fundamentally existentialist, a incredible look into the psychology and nature of man. What happens when you tear down the moral structure? Religion and natural law gets questioned.

Atmospherical and so dense that I felt all the emotions possible when reading... 

What stood out to me and interested me the most was the use of the word "mechanically" when describing a lot of Raskolnikov's actions. The use of words like this and "without thought" really implied a lack of free will in himself. This theme is also shown in other characters as well, I have no idea what this could mean, I noticed it however and I thought it was really interesting.. perhaps a look into the morality issue, is fate decided for you? if its "mechanically inclined" is it therefore just? 

Raskolnikov has no money and it is shown from the start that he is in a almost desperate state of mind having to postpone his studies because he cannot afford. He eats next to nothing and lives in rags. Although he does not care? When presented with money he does not take it, when he does have it he gives it away to others to help themselves.. multiple times. He is not materialistic so why commit this crime? Seemingly uncharacteristic, no monetary motive and fraught with severe self turmoil and guilt. (he literally fainted whenever the murder was mentioned... which was a lot)   

I will stop rambling on about this now, however I will be rereading this in the future and I am sure I will learn even more about this, as it is such a DENSE body of work that it is near impossible to understand after reading only once. 

If you have read this book and have opinions/interpretations about it please let me know because I would love to learn more.

jaz ☁️

After a month I have finally finished my first ever Dostoevsky!!! 

There is absolutely no need for a review of this book at all however I will give my very brief "take" and reading experience of this piece of literature. (aka a word & thought dump because I simply cannot put it all cohesively together this soon after finishing)

I think its really important to note that the way this story was published was in parts, serialized format, and Dostoevsky loves a cliffhanger. (so expect long long chapters) 

Morality

The nature of morality. Fundamentally existentialist, a incredible look into the psychology and nature of man. What happens when you tear down the moral structure? Religion and natural law gets questioned.

Atmospherical and so dense that I felt all the emotions possible when reading... 

What stood out to me and interested me the most was the use of the word "mechanically" when describing a lot of Raskolnikov's actions. The use of words like this and "without thought" really implied a lack of free will in himself. This theme is also shown in other characters as well, I have no idea what this could mean, I noticed it however and I thought it was really interesting.. perhaps a look into the morality issue, is fate decided for you? if its "mechanically inclined" is it therefore just? 

Poverty

Raskolnikov has no money and it is shown from the start that he is in a almost desperate state of mind having to postpone his studies because he cannot afford. He eats next to nothing and lives in rags. Although he does not care? When presented with money he does not take it, when he does have it he gives it away to others to help themselves.. multiple times. He is not materialistic so why commit this crime? Seemingly uncharacteristic, no monetary motive and fraught with severe self turmoil and guilt. (he literally fainted whenever the murder was mentioned... which was a lot)   

I will stop rambling on about this now, however I will be rereading this in the future and I am sure I will learn even more about this, as it is such a DENSE body of work that it is near impossible to understand after reading only once. 

If you have read this book and have opinions/interpretations about it please let me know because I would love to learn more.

Crime and Punishment

Reviews

Highlights