Lukas

The only mistake George Orwell made in his anti-utopia 1984 was the date. A lot of things that he described as if happening in 1984 can be observed in the nowadays world. However, he depicted the future that everyone should be afraid of at any time. “I am sure that totalitarian idea lives in the consciousness of intellectuals everywhere, and I tried to follow this idea till the end. My story is set in England to emphasize that English speaking nations are not better than others and that the totalitarianism can win everywhere if it is not fought against”, George Orwell wrote not long before his death.

1984 by George Orwell

George Orwell

1984, published in 1949, is a dystopian and satirical novel. It revolves around Winston Smith, who lives in a nation called Oceania, in a province called Airstrip One, which represents present-day England. This state is controlled by the Party, headed by a mysterious leader who is addressed as Emmanuel Goldstein, also known as the Big Brother. The Party watches every single move that Smith and other citizens make. The nation's language and history is forcefully changed for the benefit of the Party. A new language, Newspeak, is being compulsively implemented to ensure works that have anything to do with political rebellion are omitted. In Oceania, even rebellious thoughts are illegal and are said to be the worst of all crimes. The people are suppressed and any form of individuality is not tolerated, including love and sex. Smith works as a low-ranking member of the Party who alters historical records. He hates the Party and thus buys an illegal diary in which he pens down his thoughts. He meets Julia, a coworker, who seems to been romantically inclined towards him. He however doubts that she is a Party spy who will get him imprisoned for his 'thoughtcrimes'. Her love turns out to be true and they have a covert affair. Smith's hatred for the Party grows day by day and he is convinced that a powerful Party official O'Brien is actually trying to overthrow the present government with the help of a secret group named the Brotherhood. As the story goes on, readers learn the twists and turns that life in Oceania has in store for Smith. He faces terror, betrayal, freedom, and a broken spirit. 1984 is the author's haunting vision of the future. The book has been adapted into television programmes, films, radio broadcasts and plays. In 2003, the book was number 8 on BBC's survey The Big Read. It was 6th and 13th on the reader's and editor's list of Modern Library 100 Best Novels, respectively. In 2005, it was added to the 100 Best English Language Novel from 1923 to 2005 by TIME magazine. ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Eric Arthur Blair, better known by his pen name George Orwell (1903-1950), was an English author and journalist. His work is marked by keen intelligence and wit, a profound awareness of social injustice, an intense opposition to totalitarianism, a passion for clarity in language, and a belief in democratic socialism. In addition to his literary career Orwell served as a police officer with the Indian Imperial Police in Burma from 1922-1927 and fought with the Republicans in the Spanish Civil War from 1936-1937. He was severely wounded when he was shot through his throat. Orwell and his wife were accused of 'Rabid Trotskyism' and tried in absentia in Barcelona, along with other leaders of the POUM, in 1938. However by then they had escaped from Spain and returned to England. Between 1941 and 1943, Orwell worked on propaganda for the BBC. In 1943, he became literary editor of the Tribune, a weekly left-wing magazine. He was a prolific polemical journalist, article writer, literary critic, reviewer, poet and writer of fiction, and considered perhaps the twentieth century's best chronicler of English culture. Orwell is best known for the dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four (published in 1949) and the satirical novella Animal Farm (1945)-they have together sold more copies than any two books by any other twentieth-century author. His 1938 book Homage to Catalonia, an account of his experiences as a volunteer on the Republican side during the Spanish Civil War, together with numerous essays on politics, literature, language, and culture, are widely acclaimed. In 2008, The Times ranked him second on a list of 'The 50 greatest British writers since 1945'.

1984

akshita

The essential act of war is destruction, not necessarily of human lives, but the products of human labour.

War is a way of shattering to pieces, or pouring into the stratosphere, or sinking in the depths of the sea, materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses too comfortable, or in the long run, too intelligent. 

Even when weapons of war are not destroyed, their manufacture is still a convenient way of expending labour power without producing anything that can be consumed. 

To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully - constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions that cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them; 

to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to forget whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it all again: and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself.

George Orwell’s 1984 takes on new life with extraordinary relevance and renewed popularity. “Orwell saw, to his credit, that the act of falsifying reality is only secondarily a way of changing perceptions. It is, above all, a way of asserting power.”—The New Yorker In 1984, London is a grim city in the totalitarian state of Oceania where Big Brother is always watching you and the Thought Police can practically read your mind. Winston Smith is a man in grave danger for the simple reason that his memory still functions. Drawn into a forbidden love affair, Winston finds the courage to join a secret revolutionary organization called The Brotherhood, dedicated to the destruction of the Party. Together with his beloved Julia, he hazards his life in a deadly match against the powers that be. Lionel Trilling said of Orwell’s masterpiece, “1984 is a profound, terrifying, and wholly fascinating book. It is a fantasy of the political future, and like any such fantasy, serves its author as a magnifying device for an examination of the present.” Though the year 1984 now exists in the past, Orwell’s novel remains an urgent call for the individual willing to speak truth to power.

Anzkebdvd

tigress stalking a small deer. Rupert suddenly

Altair

"You had to live—did live, from habit that became instinct—in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized."

Angelica Garcia

Perhaps one did not want to be loved so much as to be understood.

Thomas Pynchon

Nineteen Eighty-Four

🍵

For if leisure and security were enjoyed by all alike, the great mass of human beings who are normally stupefied by poverty would become literate and would learn to think for themselves; and when they had done this, they would sooner or later realise that the privileged minority had no function, and they would sweep it away. In the long run, hierarchical society was only possible on a basis of poverty and ignorance.

But after reading it he knew better than before that he was not mad. Being in a minority, even a minority of one, did not make you mad. There was truth and there was untruth, and if you clung to the truth even against the whole world, you were not mad 

In a way, the world-view of the Party imposed itself most successfully on people incapable of understanding it. They could be made to accept the most flagrant violations of reality, because they never fully grasped the enormity of what was demanded of them, and were not sufficiently interested in public events to notice what was happening. By lack of understanding they remained sane. They simply swallowed everything, and what they swallowed did them no harm, because it left no residue behind, just as a grain of corn will pass undigested through the body of a bird.

In this game that we’re playing, we can’t win. Some kinds of failure are better than other kinds, that’s all.

Naïa

Perhaps one did not want to be loved so much as to be understood

Every new political theory, by whatever name it called itself, led back to hierarchy and regimentation. And in the general hardening of outlook that set in round about 1930, practices which had been long abandoned, in some cases for hundreds of years—imprisonment without trial, the use of war prisoners as slaves, public executions, torture to extract confessions, the use of hostages and the deportation of whole populations—not only became common again, but were tolerated and even defended by people who considered themselves enlightened and progressive.

It’s the one thing they can't do. They can make you say anything—anything—but they can't make you believe it. They can’t get inside you.

Privacy, he said, was a very valuable thing. Everyone wanted a place where they could be alone occasionally.

So long as human beings stay human, death and life are the same thing.

Jena

It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted to. You had to live did live, from habit that became instinct-in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized.

Yajat Dayal

Maja Ruzicic

Applied to a Party member, it means a loyal willingness to say that black is white when Party discipline demands this. But it means also the ability to BELIEVE that black is white, and more, to KNOW that black is white, and to forget that one has ever believed the contrary.

anne

Die Massen revoltieren nie aus eigenem Antrieb, und sie revoltieren nie, nur weil sie unterdrückt werden. Solange man ihnen die Vergleichsmaßstäbe entzieht, werden sie nicht einmal merken, daß man sie unterdrückt 

Wäre ihm der Kontakt mit Ausländern gestattet, würde er feststellen, daß sie ganz ähnliche Menschen sind wie er und daß das meiste, was er über sie gehört hat, Lügen waren. 

a novel

Nineteen eighty-four

Luca Stromann

Talking to her, he realised how easy it was to present an appearance of orthodoxy while having no grasp whatever of what orthodoxy meant. In a way, the world-view of the Party imposed itself most successfully on people incapable of understanding it. They could be made to accept the most flagrant violations of reality, because they never fully grasped the enormity of what was demanded of them, and were not sufficiently interested in public events to notice what was happening. By lack of understanding they remained sane.

depiction of what could've happened if the government succeeded in gaslighting and manipulating their people. 

Soph

Library Edition

Rushikesh Gaikwad

Parts in 1984 that stood out to me and gave me Deja Vu:

"It was always at night--the arrests invariably happened at night. The sudden jerk out of sleep, the rough hand shaking your shoulder, the lights glaring in your eyes, the ring of hard faces round the bed. In the vast majority of cases there was no trial, no report of the arrest. People simply disappeared, always during the night. Your name was removed from the registers, every record of everything you had ever done was wiped out, your one-time existence was denied and then forgotten. You were abolished, annihilated: vaporized was the usual word. (From Chapter 1 of Part 1).

"6079 Smith W! Yes, you! Bend lower, please! You can do better than that. You're not trying. Lower, please! That's better, comrade. Now stand at ease, the whole squad, and watch me!" (From Chapter 3 of Part 1)

"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." (Chapter 7, Part 1)

The entire passage about the Inner Party is important but i want to focus on "The two aims of the Party are to conquer the whole surface of the earth and to extinguish once and for all the possibility of independent thought." (Chapter 9, Part 2)

" 'Down with Big Brother!' Yes, I said that! Said it over and over again, it seems. Between you and me, old man, I'm glad they got me before it went any further. Do you know what I'm going to say to them when I go up before the tribunal? 'Thank you,' I'm going to say, 'thank you for saving my before it was too late.' "

"It was my little daughter," said Parsons with a sort of doleful pride."

Susan

Parts in 1984 that stood out to me and gave me Deja Vu:

"It was always at night--the arrests invariably happened at night. The sudden jerk out of sleep, the rough hand shaking your shoulder, the lights glaring in your eyes, the ring of hard faces round the bed. In the vast majority of cases there was no trial, no report of the arrest. People simply disappeared, always during the night. Your name was removed from the registers, every record of everything you had ever done was wiped out, your one-time existence was denied and then forgotten. You were abolished, annihilated: vaporized was the usual word. (From Chapter 1 of Part 1).

"6079 Smith W! Yes, you! Bend lower, please! You can do better than that. You're not trying. Lower, please! That's better, comrade. Now stand at ease, the whole squad, and watch me!" (From Chapter 3 of Part 1)

"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." (Chapter 7, Part 1)

The entire passage about the Inner Party is important but i want to focus on "The two aims of the Party are to conquer the whole surface of the earth and to extinguish once and for all the possibility of independent thought." (Chapter 9, Part 2)

" 'Down with Big Brother!' Yes, I said that! Said it over and over again, it seems. Between you and me, old man, I'm glad they got me before it went any further. Do you know what I'm going to say to them when I go up before the tribunal? 'Thank you,' I'm going to say, 'thank you for saving my before it was too late.' "

"Who denounced you?" said Winston.

"It was my little daughter," said Parsons with a sort of doleful pride."

(Chapter 1, Part 3)

I’m starting to realise the classics are classic for a reason lol 

amy isabella

One of the most unforgettable allegories of all time. The blackest mirror a reader will ever peer into.

Blake Dickson

I know a sound is still a sound around no one

I didn’t live through 1984, but somehow… it feels like I’m living 

 it. Surveillance, manipulation, thought control, things that once felt distant now feel eerily familiar. It’s not just a book about a dystopia.

It’s a manual the world seems to be quietly following, one update at a time.

Tanishq Khandelwal

I didn’t live through 1984, but somehow… it feels like I’m living in it. Surveillance, manipulation, thought control, things that once felt distant now feel eerily familiar. It’s not just a book about a dystopia.
It’s a manual the world seems to be quietly following, one update at a time.

The way this world is built, described and live in has not left me, absolute classic

Sam Uhe

Pedro Teixeira

1984 is undoubtedly my favorite book. It leaves me speechless every time I read it, and the story still resonates with current events. A timeless book.

Sherilyn Bourillon 

gishelle

How can one come up with such a plot? It’s literally insane to me how George Orwell just sat down and started coming up with this insane world with a whole new language, system, behaviours and words and it all makes so much sense and no sense at all, all at the same time. It’s literally insane. And then the fact that our main character is literally a prick, a weirdo, high key evil and has some… interesting thoughts but even towards the end I just feel sick for him. It’s so crazy. The party are mad. The proles are lowkey living life. The outer party are literally all brainwashed it’s insane. O’Brien is actually an opp. This book was a great commentary on social society, and how our world conforms to the plot of this book today. 

surtified™

How can one come up with such a plot? It’s literally insane to me how George Orwell just sat down and started coming up with this insane world with a whole new language, system, behaviours and words and it all makes so much sense and no sense at all, all at the same time. It’s literally insane. And then the fact that our main character is literally a prick, a weirdo, high key evil and has some… interesting thoughts but even towards the end I just feel sick for him. It’s so crazy. The party are mad. The proles are lowkey living life. The outer party are literally all brainwashed it’s insane. O’Brien is actually an opp. This book was a great commentary on social society, and how our world conforms to the plot of this book today. 

Crazy. Book. Would recommend. 

um livro ok, enrolado em muitos momentos e começa a ficar interessante mais pro final 

camile

This story highlights the bleak reality of totalitarian regimes and how easily they can infiltrate the minds of their citizens. People don’t like to believe they’re as susceptible as they are, but throughout history — and even today — we see the systematic efforts government forces put into controlling the population and how effective it is. It’s unfortunate that this story is still as relevant as it is today. There’s strong imagery of both rebellion and what happens when people are broken down by the system, and while I found myself annoyed at the characters throughout the story, I understand their actions. To me, Winston is a very unlikable man, but I still found myself sympathetic to aspects of his story.

Overall, I enjoyed this a lot. I just wish some of the pacing was different, and there was a section where my engagement with the text started to wane, disrupting my focus.

Nik ✨

This story highlights the bleak reality of totalitarian regimes and how easily they can infiltrate the minds of their citizens. People don’t like to believe they’re as susceptible as they are, but throughout history — and even today — we see the systematic efforts government forces put into controlling the population and how effective it is. It’s unfortunate that this story is still as relevant as it is today. There’s strong imagery of both rebellion and what happens when people are broken down by the system, and while I found myself annoyed at the characters throughout the story, I understand their actions. To me, Winston is a very unlikable man, but I still found myself sympathetic to aspects of his story.

Overall, I enjoyed this a lot. I just wish some of the pacing was different, and there was a section where my engagement with the text started to wane, disrupting my focus.

I need a moment of silence and peace after this please

Agnese

Ani Velasquez

incredible book, renewed my love for reading and books, got me thinking deeply about our current relationship with surveillance and media, as well as where society is heading for in the future.

Reflecting the time it was created it is a masterpiece with some small critic points. It is a depressing but catching story, with a longer excursus into world politics and conspiracies. 5 stars from a release date perspective, 4.5 stars for todays standards. Impressive how accurate it still is.

J Fra

ophelia ross 

Holy fuck this depressing-ass book… I’m so glad I only read this now and wasn’t forced to read it in secondary school because I don’t think I would have appreciated it as much as I do right now. Loved “Goldstein’s book”, and I love love loved how Orwell expanded on the control of thought via language. I.e. the entire Appendix was so interesting… 4.5 stars because I almost gave up at Part One and also because I really do not like Winston unfortunately. — “Can you not understand, Winston, that the individual is only a cell? The weariness of the cell is the vigor of the organism. Do you die when you cut your fingernails?”

Nicole

The closest thing to the term "Timeless classic"

I consider the way Orwell portray absolute control to be absolutely haunting. History is not just blurred, it's fictitious. Freedom is stripped to its most naked form that even the freedom to think is taken.

1984 is not just a contemplative critic to authoritarianism, it's also a warning to society. This is what happens if you let power unchecked for too long.

catto fishu

The closest thing to the term "Timeless classic"

I consider the way Orwell portray absolute control to be absolutely haunting. History is not just blurred, it's fictitious. Freedom is stripped to its most naked form that even the freedom to think is taken.

1984 is not just a contemplative critic to authoritarianism, it's also a warning to society. This is what happens if you let power unchecked for too long.

How it was illustrated with his writing is what i appreciate about this book 

Rusydi Aman

first this year and it was RUFFFFF. felt cool after reading! i'm amazedd

1984 by George Orwell

Reviews

Highlights