Name: The Stranger
Rating: 3.909324522760646 (1362 reviews)
ISBN: 9780307827661

Albert Camus

Through the story of an ordinary man unwittingly drawn into a senseless murder on an Algerian beach, Camus explored what he termed "the nakedness of man faced with the absurd." First published in 1946; now in a new translation by Matthew Ward.

The Stranger

He sounds so distraught already Like besties dwelling on the day rather than the fact his ma's passed away bless

surtified™

Maman died today. Or yesterday maybe, I don’t know. I got a telegram from the home: “Mother deceased. Funeral tomorrow. Faithfully yours.” That doesn’t mean anything. Maybe it was yesterday.

Dingdong 

Katherine

sukan

Yennifer Villa

Beliz Kaya

 "Söyleyecek fazla bir seyim hiçbir zaman olmadı. Ben de sustum’’ 

avarni

Evenings in these parts must be a sort of mournful solace. Now, in the full glare of the morning sun, with everything shimmering in the heat haze, there was something inhuman, discouraging, about this landscape.

I pictured myself going straight to bed and sleeping twelve hours at a stretch

From the dark horizon of my future a sort of slow, persistent breeze had been blowing toward me, all my life long, from the years that were to come. And on its way that breeze had leveled out all the ideas that people tried to foist on me in the equally unreal years I then was living through.

myldaa

I answered that one never changed his way of life; one life was as good as another, and my present one suited me quite well

Son raisonnement est si machinal, ça enlève la capacité d’identification du lecteur au protagoniste et au développement de l’histoire.

C’est déroutant le manque d’émotions et de morale que nous jugeons de survenue naturelle. L’indifférence le fait apparaître comme subissant chaque événement et relation.

“Subir” sa vie, c’est laisser les autres décider pour nous.

Chaïmae

“Mais Raymond m’a dit qu’il ne se sentait pas capable de faire la lettre qu’il fallait et qu’il avait pensé à moi pour la rédiger. Comme je ne disais rien, il m’a demandé si cela m’ennuierait de le faire tout de suite et j’ai répondu que non. (…) J’ai fait la lettre. Je l’ai écrite un peu au hasard, mais je me suis appliqué à contenter Raymond parce que je n’avais pas de raison de ne pas le contenter.”

L’indifférence passe pour antipathie, et quand un Homme est perçu coupable, il le devient.

“C’est à peine si, ensuite, on a écouté Masson qui a déclaré que j’étais un honnête homme « et qu’il dirait plus, j’étais un brave homme ». C’est à peine encore si on a écouté Salamano quand il a rappelé que j’avais été bon pour son chien et quand il a répondu à une question sur ma mère et sur moi en disant que je n’avais plus rien à dire à maman et que je l’avais mise pour cette raison à l’asile. « Il faut comprendre, disait Salamano, il faut comprendre. » Mais personne ne paraissait comprendre. On l’a emmené.”

We just sat there like that for quite a while. The woman’s sighs and sobs were quieting down. She sniffled a lot. Then finally she shut up.

I said, “Yes,” just so I wouldn’t have to say anything else.

. It was pleasant; the coffee had warmed me up, and the smell of flowers on the night air was coming through the open door. I think I dozed off for a while.

...my joy when the bus entered the nest of lights that was Algiers and I knew I was going to go to bed and sleep for twelve hours.

I don't see where the existentialism is gonna fall into play.

t was nice, and, sort of joking around, I let my head fall back and rest on her stomach. She didn’t say anything so I left it there.

the being so quick to defend himself to someone is fr

She gave a little start but didn’t say anything. I felt like telling her it wasn’t my fault, but I stopped myself because I remembered that I’d already said that to my boss. It didn’t mean anything. Besides, you always feel a little guilty

s. I remembered that it was Sunday, and that bothered me: I don’t like Sundays

Ritik Sahni

Get your "A" in gear! They're today's most popular study guides-with everything you need to succeed in school. Written by Harvard students for students, since its inception SparkNotes™ has developed a loyal community of dedicated users and become a major education brand. Consumer demand has been so strong that the guides have expanded to over 150 titles. SparkNotes'™ motto is Smarter, Better, Faster because: · They feature the most current ideas and themes, written by experts. · They're easier to understand, because the same people who use them have also written them. · The clear writing style and edited content enables students to read through the material quickly, saving valuable time. And with everything covered--context; plot overview; character lists; themes, motifs, and symbols; summary and analysis, key facts; study questions and essay topics; and reviews and resources--you don't have to go anywhere else!

 I am still trying to find the purpose behind this short novel, with my previous tries gone in vain. I dont see the hype behind this novel; such a great plot idea regarding human detatchment from society yet such a poor execution. I dont see why people end up recommending this book. Lastly, very disappointing ending

Aarush Arora

"Quand la sonnerie a encore retenti, que la porte du box s'est ouverte, c'est le silence de la salle qui est monté vers moi, le silence, et cette singulière sensation que j'ai eue lorsque j'ai constaté que le jeune journaliste avait détourné les yeux. Je n'ai pas regardé du côté de Marie. Je n'en ai pas eu le temps parce que le président m'a dit dans une forme bizarre que j'aurais la tête tranchée sur une place publique au nom du peuple français..."

L'étranger

I hate this book. It's clever, but I hate it. I'm sorry to anyone who likes it but it's definitely not for me

Robin Taylor

An ordinary man is unwittingly caught up in a senseless murder in Algeria.

thya

hmmmm I don't really know how to feel about this book

Neil Rafaa

Just finished reading , its good, i really like it

Sebastian Gonzalez

Just finished reading , its good, i really like it

it was too hot ,IT WAS TOO HOT



Joaquín Montoya 

 “Era como si durante toda la vida hubiese esperado este minuto... y esta brevísima alba en la que quedaría justificado. Nada, nada tenía importancia, y yo sabía bien por qué. También él sabía por qué. Desde lo hondo de mi porvenir, durante toda esta vida absurda que había llevado, subía hacia mí un soplo oscuro a través de los años que aún no habían llegado, y este soplo igualaba a su paso todo lo que me proponían entonces, en los años no más reales que los que estaba viviendo. ¡Qué me importaban la muerte de los otros, el amor de una madre! ¡Qué me importaban su Dios, las vidas que uno elige, los destinos que uno escoge, desde que un único destino debía de escogerme a mí y conmigo a millares de privilegiados que, como él, se decían hermanos míos! ¿Comprendía, comprendía pues? Todo el mundo era privilegiado. No había más que privilegiados. También a los otros los condenarían un día. También a él lo condenarían. ¿Qué importaba si acusado de una muerte lo ejecutaban por no haber llorado en el entierro de su madre? El perro de Salamano valía tanto como su mujer. La mujercita autómata era tan culpable como la parisiense que se había casado con Masson, o como María, que había deseado casarse conmigo. ¿Qué importaba que Raimundo fuese compañero mío tanto como Celeste, que valía más que él? ¿Qué importaba que María diese hoy su boca a un nuevo Meursault? Comprendía, pues, este Condenado, que desde lo hondo de mi porvenir... Me ahogaba gritando todo esto. “

Meursault, ein kleiner Beamter in Algier, führt ein Dasein, das sich in nichts von dem seiner Mitmenschen unterscheidet. Bis er eines Nachmittags ohne ersichtlichen Grund einen Menschen tötet. (Orig. Ausg.: 1942).

Roman

Der Fremde

Das Buch „Der Fremde“ von Albert Camus ist ein Hauptwerk der Philosophie des Existenzialismus und des Absurdismus. Es beschreibt die Geschichte des Algierfranzosen Meursault, der das Leben in kompletter Gleichgültigkeit lebt und keinen Aufwand betreibt dem gesellschaftlich Norm gerecht zur werden. Durch einen Zufall jedoch erschießt er einen Mann und wird dafür verurteilt. Während des Gerichtsprozesses jedoch steht Meursault‘s Charakter mehr in Fokus wie die eigentliche Straftat, welche er begangen hat.

Das Werk ist in zwei Teilen gegliedert und wird aus der Perspektive von Meursault erzählt. Die Handlung beginnt damit, dass er von dem Tod seiner Mutter erfährt und daraufhin ihre Beerdigung besucht. Er verliert keine Träne, spürt nicht ihren Verlust & weiß gewiss nicht einmal ihren Alter. Auch in anderen Situationen spürt Meursault keinen moralischen Problem mit seiner Entscheidungen/ Handlungen. Er reagiert immerzu mit emotional Distanz, beispielsweise in dem Moment in dem ihm ein Antrag gemacht wurde oder er einen möglichen Jobwechsel nach Paris eingehen sollte.

Bei der Verhandlung im Gerichtssaal erwägt er nicht die Versuchung seine Tat zu rechtfertigen oder eine Erklärung abzugeben. Er war während des Prozesses abwesend, nahm nur weniges, was über ihn gesprochen wurde wahr und akzeptiert jeden möglichen Ausgang des Verfahrens. Dieses Verhalten bzw. sein Eigenart macht ihn zum Fremden in der Gesellschaft und schlichtweg dafür wird er auch verurteilt. Nicht für die Erschießung eines Menschen.

Er hat sich konträr zur gesellschaftlichen Erwartungen verhalten bzw. diese komplett abgelehnt. Er lügt nicht, täuscht keine Emotionen und Gefühle vor um andere nicht zu verletzen oder gar um sein Leben zu retten. Für Meursault ist alles, wie auch das Leben, Sinnlos und die Welt ist gleichgültig.

Anbetracht der Tatsache, dass dies das erste Werk ist von Camus, dass ich bislang gelesen habe, war ich vom Stil etwas überrascht und zur Beginn auch teils irritiert. Nichtsdestotrotz fand ich das Buch im ganzen sehr interessant und für mich mal was ganz Neues. Meine Aufmerksamkeit hatte das Buch von der ersten Zeile an! Der Schreibstil (zumindest die Übersetzung) ist sehr simple & recht modern gefasst. Lange Rede kurzer Sinn, ich habe es gerne gelesen und werde sicherlich weitere Werke von ihm in nahen Zukunft lesen aber.. entweder ist mir die Thematik zu viel oder irgendwas fehlt. Ich kann es nach langem überlegen nicht greifbar machen - vielleicht wenn ich mich mehr mit Existenzialismus und/ oder Camus befasst habe. 🧚‍♀️

Hadisa

Das Buch „Der Fremde“ von Albert Camus ist ein Hauptwerk der Philosophie des Existenzialismus und des Absurdismus. Es beschreibt die Geschichte des Algierfranzosen Meursault, der das Leben in kompletter Gleichgültigkeit lebt und keinen Aufwand betreibt dem gesellschaftlich Norm gerecht zur werden. Durch einen Zufall jedoch erschießt er einen Mann und wird dafür verurteilt. Während des Gerichtsprozesses jedoch steht Meursault‘s Charakter mehr in Fokus wie die eigentliche Straftat, welche er begangen hat.

Das Werk ist in zwei Teilen gegliedert und wird aus der Perspektive von Meursault erzählt. Die Handlung beginnt damit, dass er von dem Tod seiner Mutter erfährt und daraufhin ihre Beerdigung besucht. Er verliert keine Träne, spürt nicht ihren Verlust & weiß gewiss nicht einmal ihren Alter. Auch in anderen Situationen spürt Meursault keinen moralischen Problem mit seiner Entscheidungen/ Handlungen. Er reagiert immerzu mit emotional Distanz, beispielsweise in dem Moment in dem ihm ein Antrag gemacht wurde oder er einen möglichen Jobwechsel nach Paris eingehen sollte.

Bei der Verhandlung im Gerichtssaal erwägt er nicht die Versuchung seine Tat zu rechtfertigen oder eine Erklärung abzugeben. Er war während des Prozesses abwesend, nahm nur weniges, was über ihn gesprochen wurde wahr und akzeptiert jeden möglichen Ausgang des Verfahrens. Dieses Verhalten bzw. sein Eigenart macht ihn zum Fremden in der Gesellschaft und schlichtweg dafür wird er auch verurteilt. Nicht für die Erschießung eines Menschen.

Er hat sich konträr zur gesellschaftlichen Erwartungen verhalten bzw. diese komplett abgelehnt. Er lügt nicht, täuscht keine Emotionen und Gefühle vor um andere nicht zu verletzen oder gar um sein Leben zu retten. Für Meursault ist alles, wie auch das Leben, Sinnlos und die Welt ist gleichgültig.

Anbetracht der Tatsache, dass dies das erste Werk ist von Camus, dass ich bislang gelesen habe, war ich vom Stil etwas überrascht und zur Beginn auch teils irritiert. Nichtsdestotrotz fand ich das Buch im ganzen sehr interessant und für mich mal was ganz Neues. Meine Aufmerksamkeit hatte das Buch von der ersten Zeile an! Der Schreibstil (zumindest die Übersetzung) ist sehr simple & recht modern gefasst. Lange Rede kurzer Sinn, ich habe es gerne gelesen und werde sicherlich weitere Werke von ihm in nahen Zukunft lesen aber.. entweder ist mir die Thematik zu viel oder irgendwas fehlt. Ich kann es nach langem überlegen nicht greifbar machen - vielleicht wenn ich mich mehr mit Existenzialismus und/ oder Camus befasst habe. 🧚‍♀️

A slow one and one of my first more serious social books for a lack of better words. It is very stand offish but an interesting, quick read. 

Stephanie Funfsinn

cass

self-intuitive and reflective, this novel truly is a masterpiece, and so fucking clever. the apathy that the narrator carrie’s with him gives such an innately interesting air to the entire course of the novel - it is really one of those books that you sit and stare at the wall after you’ve read. there’s so much to be analysed and drawn from on the portrayal of existentialism through the lense of an absurdist writer, especially due to the perspective that the story is told! the pacing is great; the way it utilised this tension through it was so clever, camus is a master of his craft. my only quarm is in the moments that couldn’t quite find that balance between absurdist thought and the course of the plot, as some moments lacked the deeper element whilst others had too much, to the point where the book felt stuck in its place and didn’t progress. 

the style of writing is so intriguing to me. it feels so modern, yet the book itself was written 80 years ago, so i’m not sure if that is the result of translation or the genuine style that camus inbeds, as this is his first work i’ve read, however i will have a look at the original french version for insight :)

i also think that this is one of my favourite closing lines of a book, i audibly gasped as the phrase ended, so mind blowingly smart and reflective. i also relate to it in a really weird way that is super seperate from the philosophical purpose and prose, as an autistic person.  there are moments where i really relate to mersault, the almost separated feeling from your surroundings really resonated with me weirdly. 

def recommend, think it would have been a great text to fully analyse!

'The sky seemed to rip apart from end to end to pour fire down upon me' Meursault will not conform. When his mother dies, he refuses to show his emotions simply to satisfy the expectations of others. And when he commits a random act of violence on a sun-drenched beach, his lack of remorse only compounds his guilt in the eyes of society and the law. Albert Camus' portrayal of a man confronting the absurdity of human life became a classic. Yet it is also a book filled with quiet joy in the physical world, and this new translation sensitively renders the subtleties and dreamlike atmosphere of The Outsider. A new translation by Sandra Smith

The Outsider

Vesta

Seeing as how many people have mixed feelings about Meursault, I kind of feel ashamed that not only did I understand him but I felt I saw a portion of myself in him as I read the pages…

purvi

Sindhujaw

Ironic. How we can only hope to live, only after we truly die.

Raiza Zaldiarizki

what are the odds that someone who always lived a quiet and almost robot-like life, ends up in such a big problem? 

I haven’t read fiction this arresting in a long time. The opening line alone is so remarkable that I had to take a pause and gear up for what followed. The story of Meursault is that he fails to live with a narrative to please societal expectations.

Camus stages a thought experiment with the help of Meursault: What happens if a man refuses to lie emotionally in a world that requires it?

The book is about the punishment you get for not living up to social expectations regardless of how you feel.

Meursault is ruthless, but in an honest way that intends no harm for others and yet, he’s punished for being that way.

About the writing, Matthew Ward’s translation serves as a charming, magnetic outlook into the story of Meursault. It’s easy to step into his world, but impossible to judge his actions comfortably.

A lot more thoughts to be shared, a lot more conversations to be had about this book.

I haven’t read fiction this arresting in a long time. The opening line alone is so remarkable that I had to take a pause and gear up for what followed. The story of Meursault is that he fails to live with a narrative to please societal expectations.

Camus stages a thought experiment with the help of Meursault: What happens if a man refuses to lie emotionally in a world that requires it?

The book is about the punishment you get for not living up to social expectations regardless of how you feel.

Meursault is ruthless, but in an honest way that intends no harm for others and yet, he’s punished for being that way.

About the writing, Matthew Ward’s translation serves as a charming, magnetic outlook into the story of Meursault. It’s easy to step into his world, but impossible to judge his actions comfortably.

A lot more thoughts to be shared, a lot more conversations to be had about this book.

Timeless.

i can see why so many people love this book with its philosophical questions, existentialism, nod to atheism, and so forth. but 

Aida Mateescu

i can see why so many people love this book with its philosophical questions, existentialism, nod to atheism, and so forth. but i think it's just mediocre, all of it.

so, no. i mean non.

This book had me hooked from the opening line, and its existential vibe stuck with me long after finishing. It’s short, sharp, and strangely relatable if you’ve ever felt numb or indifferent to the world around you.

The plot is deceptively simple: a man, Meursault, drifts through life with an almost clinical detachment, and an unexpected event throws him into conflict with society. What I loved was how Camus turns a seemingly minimal story into a profound meditation on life, death, and meaning. Nothing felt forced, and the pacing kept me engaged even though the events themselves were understated.

Meursault is the star here, and what makes him compelling is his unapologetic authenticity. He refuses to conform to societal expectations, which is both frustrating and fascinating. His detachment makes it difficult to empathize with him in a traditional sense, but that’s exactly the point. Supporting characters, like his mother and his girlfriend, provide context for his interactions with the world, but the story really revolves around his internal experience. Their presence is subtle yet effective in highlighting Meursault’s unique worldview.

Camus’ writing is precise and minimalistic, which perfectly suits the existential themes of the novel. Short sentences and careful observations create a sense of immediacy and immersion. I appreciated the restraint in description and emotion—it mirrors Meursault’s own detachment and allows the philosophical undertones to resonate without being preachy.

Absolutely. This is a must-read for anyone interested in existential literature or classic French novels. If you enjoy authors like Dostoevsky or Kafka, you’ll likely appreciate Camus’ style and philosophical depth. I’d recommend the translated editions that stay faithful to the original’s tone; the Marion Faber translation is widely praised for preserving the blunt, concise prose.

 is a short but powerful read that lingers in your mind. Its philosophical undercurrents, minimalist plot, and unforgettable protagonist make it an impactful exploration of human existence, societal norms, and the meaning we impose on life. Even if you’re not usually into existentialism, it’s worth experiencing Meursault’s world.

Tali ⋆.˚🦋༘⋆

Introduction

The Stranger by Albert Camus

Rating: 4.5 stars

This book had me hooked from the opening line, and its existential vibe stuck with me long after finishing. It’s short, sharp, and strangely relatable if you’ve ever felt numb or indifferent to the world around you.

Plot Analysis

The plot is deceptively simple: a man, Meursault, drifts through life with an almost clinical detachment, and an unexpected event throws him into conflict with society. What I loved was how Camus turns a seemingly minimal story into a profound meditation on life, death, and meaning. Nothing felt forced, and the pacing kept me engaged even though the events themselves were understated.

Character Analysis

Meursault is the star here, and what makes him compelling is his unapologetic authenticity. He refuses to conform to societal expectations, which is both frustrating and fascinating. His detachment makes it difficult to empathize with him in a traditional sense, but that’s exactly the point. Supporting characters, like his mother and his girlfriend, provide context for his interactions with the world, but the story really revolves around his internal experience. Their presence is subtle yet effective in highlighting Meursault’s unique worldview.

Writing Analysis

Camus’ writing is precise and minimalistic, which perfectly suits the existential themes of the novel. Short sentences and careful observations create a sense of immediacy and immersion. I appreciated the restraint in description and emotion—it mirrors Meursault’s own detachment and allows the philosophical undertones to resonate without being preachy.

Would I Recommend

Absolutely. This is a must-read for anyone interested in existential literature or classic French novels. If you enjoy authors like Dostoevsky or Kafka, you’ll likely appreciate Camus’ style and philosophical depth. I’d recommend the translated editions that stay faithful to the original’s tone; the Marion Faber translation is widely praised for preserving the blunt, concise prose.

Conclusion

The Stranger is a short but powerful read that lingers in your mind. Its philosophical undercurrents, minimalist plot, and unforgettable protagonist make it an impactful exploration of human existence, societal norms, and the meaning we impose on life. Even if you’re not usually into existentialism, it’s worth experiencing Meursault’s world.

It's sad how society decides what "being human" should look like. They sometimes ignore the fact that people feel and express things in different ways. For me, Meursault ain't heartless, he's just detached but not empty(?). 

Meursault leads an unremarkable, bachelor life in Algiers, but his sudden involvement in a violent confrontation throws him into turmoil as he is forced to question the fundamental values of society. Camus creates a world without a God but a society that is still subject to restrictive, man-made rules capable of alienating any who transcend them. In this most memorable of existential novels, Camus pits the lone and courageous individual against the benign indifference of the universe. Meursault's deception perfectly reflects the absurdity of life.

Truly haunting book. Fascinating and bleak vision of the inner workings of a unique character. A parable on absolutism in a corrupted world. 

Liam Richardson

It took me over a year to finish this book, not because I was busy or didn't find it interesting, but because I didn't wish for it to end. The book is broken up into two parts and the second part hooked me to finish it. I find it if you are someone who wants a subjective book of freedom in sense to read this book.

Walker Avila

man, this is me when life throws me pandesal

Tina Villarete

Very strange book. I do not recommend it. 

Tanishq Khandelwal

A short read. Doesn't contains much in the plot, which makes sense since it wasn't the focus of the book. Rather, it's an exploration of how our human value system is so different to the indifference of the world.

Viet-Hung Nguyen

"What did it matter?" " It didn't mean anything"

These 2 sentences form a foundation that captures the central theme of this book. The story comes full circle, from genuinely questioning the narrator's lack of convictions to coming to terms with the fact that "what'd it matter" after all. 

In all honesty, it was quite a perplexing read. On the surface, you'd think it was about accepting life as it is, but as the story progresses, the more you realise that it scratches deeper, there's more to it than just accepting. It explores the profound repercussions of indifference in a world that constantly pushes to find meaning in everything.

On a personal note, as someone who has always struggled to understand and interpret emotions, I was able to empathize with Meursault intimately.  Because of my tireless observations of societal rules, I was quick to point out his lack of moral convictions. (As I see it) You are expected to find meaning in everything. But for you to do so, you have to understand the emotions & the sensitivity of that matter; if you fail in that, you fail to find the meaning. And in that failure, you become a stranger, a stranger to the ones around you, a stranger to yourself.

"What did it matter?" " It didn't mean anything"
These 2 sentences form a foundation that captures the central theme of this book. The story comes full circle, from genuinely questioning the narrator's lack of convictions to coming to terms with the fact that "what'd it matter" after all. 
In all honesty, it was quite a perplexing read. On the surface, you'd think it was about accepting life as it is, but as the story progresses, the more you realise that it scratches deeper, there's more to it than just accepting. It explores the profound repercussions of indifference in a world that constantly pushes to find meaning in everything.

On a personal note, as someone who has always struggled to understand and interpret emotions, I was able to empathize with Meursault intimately.  Because of my tireless observations of societal rules, I was quick to point out his lack of moral convictions. (As I see it) You are expected to find meaning in everything. But for you to do so, you have to understand the emotions & the sensitivity of that matter; if you fail in that, you fail to find the meaning. And in that failure, you become a stranger, a stranger to the ones around you, a stranger to yourself.

The Stranger

Reviews

Highlights

Join the club