Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.

From the Author’s Foreword, 1987 During the course of the past nearly twenty years, I have become perhaps the most controversial among the influential international figures of this decade. Unlike all of the other leading candidates for the U.S. presidency since 1945, I am an influential original thinker. This is not to suggest that such prospective candidates as Vice President George Bush and Senator Robert Dole are lacking in intelligence or executive abilities. For the past forty years, the successful candidates for the presidency have been persons who, in the customary manner of speaking, advanced their political career up to that point, by doing “the right thing at the right time,” saying and doing nothing which will make enemies among important factions of the “establishment.” Bush and Dole, for example have adapted to those rules for success under ordinary conditions. However, this is a crisis; in such crises, what is customarily successful becomes a failure. Our nation has once again entered into a time when only the unusual succeeds, and the usual fails. We have entered into a period of crisis in which only original thinkers are qualified to lead. On paper, our nation is a constitutional democratic republic. In reality, it has not been such a republic for approximately one hundred years, certainly not since the sweeping changes in our form of government introduced during the presidency of Theodore Roosevelt. Most of the time, the policies of government, the selection of most leading candidates for federal office, and the majority of popular opinion, have been regulated by behind-the-scenes committees representing what is called “the establishment.” Under this arrangement, candidates for leading office present themselves, like job applicants for corporate executive appointments, to this “establishment.” The “establishment” either gives such candidates permission to campaign, or “not at this time.” If given such permission, the candidate so “authorized” seeks backing for his or her election by the “establishment,” by proving to the “establishment” that he or she can “sell” the policy which the establishment has decided to push at that time. ... I began to understand this in 1947. ... I wished General Dwight Eisenhower to campaign for the 1948 Democratic nomination. The general replied to me, stating agreement with my policy arguments in support of his candidacy, but informing me his candidacy was not appropriate at that time. There is no doubt that Eisenhower could have won the 1948 nomination and election by a landslide, had the “establishment” permitted him to campaign. …

An Autobiography By Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.

The Power of Reason 1988

The modern British liberals have thus deployed a pincers movement against the political institutions of the United States. The overt liberals attack from the “left,” while the fifth column of liberals in conservative disguises infiltrates from the “right,” and shatters the resistance against liberalism from within . . . . To the extent that the national party machines are under the total or significant control of the New York crowd around CFR, the party leaderships and their candidates are unable to reach agreement on any policies but those which run deliberately against the most vital interests of the United States and its people. . . . If the nonliberals, plus a majority of trade unionists and minority strata were to assemble themselves as a unified political force nationally, the effect of this would be to establish the New York Times, Washington Post, Newsweek, and so forth, as despised “dirty words” in a majority of the neighborhoods, factories and so forth, of the nation . . . . This has not occurred thus far, because the national profile of the two principal parties prevents the nonliberal majority of the citizenry from agreeing upon policy outlooks which efficiently correspond to the combined effect of their underlying interests and organically nonliberal impulses. --Lyndon LaRouche in this book This 1979 book by Lyndon LaRouche outlines the strategy for unifying the American citizenry around the real long term interest of each citizen, regardless of personal circumstances: endless progress. Forty years later, his insights are key to the process which is now pulling America out of the Dark Age which had been fostered by the British cultural warfare he identified. Yes, the continuous string of hoaxes from London are wearing very thin with Americans. “Lone Assassin!,” “Energy Crisis!,” “New Hitler with Weapons of Mass Destruction!,” “ ‘Recreational Drug’ Use,” “Global Warming Crisis!,” “Russia did it! (regardless of what ‘it’ is),” etc. have destroyed the credibility of the various imperial tentacles. More and more Americans, along with most of the nations of the world, are coalescing behind the ideas of Mr. LaRouche for universal progress.

How To Defeat Liberalism And William F. Buckley

"American Economist Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., has been right in his long-range economic and related forecasts--in contrast to virtually all other economists and political leaders, who have been simply wrong. This fact has not gone unnoticed. Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa and a growing chorus of nations are putting more and more of the ideas in this book into action. The time has come when all economists and political thinkers who want to remain relevant to unfolding world realities, will now wish to go much more deeply into the work of LaRouche, than simply his now-vindicated forecasts as such. They will wish to acquaint themselves with, for example, the scientific concepts of biogeochemist Vladimir Vernadsky--the initiator of the idea of the biosphere--whose concept of the "noosphere" has been used and enhanced by LaRouche."

Why Lyndon LaRouche Is The Most Successful Forecaster Of the Past Four Decades

The Economics of the Noosphere

Helga Zepp-LaRouche

It is not necessary to let millions of babies die or to murder your own aunt in order to save the trees! Lyndon LaRouche refutes the Club of Rome's Limits to Growth hoax and shows that human creativity expressed as continuous scientific and technological progress is the single prerequisite to both secure the future of humanity and to spread the principle of life through more and more of the Universe.

Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.

About

Books

Join the club