
A Certain Hunger
Reviews

A good gory, descriptive, vulgar read. Maybe a few too many similes than I cared for, but this is a great book! I love evil women!


so beautifully written. the unique writing style and detailed descriptions of pretty much everything (food, sex, violence) made it a beautiful read.

couldn’t go past the 3rd page


This book would likely make a fine screenplay, but as it stands the main character is so insufferable to read about. Entirely self-indulgent and quite frankly boring.

It was okay. Some good quotes.
The writing was good, a little flowery. Overall the story fell flat and I found myself bored a lot while reading. This book is less than 300 pages and it felt like it would never end. I think I just expected this story to be more gripping with such an interesting premise?? I’m left feeling disappointed with this one, but happy to have read a book that’s been on my shelf for 2+ years.

the first chapter of this book was so irritating i almost DNF’ed it but i’m glad i kept going because the rest of the book is much less heavy handed stylistically

Original writing style, which was the best part for me. Plot was a bit predictable and repetitive, sometimes nauseating and not in a thrilling way. Felt like the story could have been integrated a bit better and main points weren’t fully fleshed out and were incredibly heavy handed at the end. For book club!

what a great book, a definitely must read

adequate amount of man-eating

Book theme of the month: female rage Beautiful prose, engaging narrator, genuinely fun to dive into the mind of a female psychopath. Loved discussing this as a group.

A very strange but compelling book. A bit gory for me personally. Enjoyed the prose and gave me lots to think about. Excited to discuss in bookclub!

This book, though short, put me in a reading slump twice. The descriptive nature of it nauseated me, and made it difficult to read more than a couple chapters at a time. However, the ending of this book was fantastic. Everything tied up so nicely and I wasn’t left with a single question. Dorothy is definitely an interesting character and I enjoyed her strong voice. This novel is so unique— I’ve never, and probably never will again, read anything like it.

I've never had such a vivid image in my mind while reading a book

it sucked.

the canniblism was so tame, i just wanted more of that “dark” stuff

3.5

I believe in women’s wrongs. Very descriptive when it comes to the how the organs and body parts were prepared and the taste profile. The writing is very dynamic and a bit crass. I like that the language used contrasts the image of the main character and it just shows how much work she put into keeping it. Very funny.

definitivamente foi diferente do que eu esperava, mas isso é bem comum entre as minhas leituras, já que tenho costume de não procurar saber tudo sobre um livro antes de ler ele, gosto da sensação de ir descobrindo sobre enquanto leio.
a escrita me agradou bastante, mas imagino que talvez não seja o tipo de livro que vá prender a atenção de alguém que prefere uma leitura acelerada, os capítulos não são entediantes mas são desenvolvidos de forma lenta e a narração é bem paciente.
é como uma versão feminina de american psycho, inclusive apesar de não ter lido o livro, eu suponho que a narração deles deva ter suas semelhanças. foi uma leitura que eu gostei, mas preciso admitir que eu tinha expectativas um pouco mais altas quando quis ler.
gosto muito de como a quantidade de informações sobre personagem foi distribuída cautelosamente, era como se realmente a cada página lida o leitor entendesse mais o funcionamento da mente conturbada da dorothy ( protagonista e narradora ), e as razões “justificando” seus pensamentos, suas ações e as consequências de tudo. achei legal a ironia dela ser canibal e crítica de gastronomia, deu um toque hannibal para a trama ( apesar de que os dois não tem nem comparação no meu ponto de vista ), também gostei de como a obsessão dela por comida e alimentação é algo demonstrado desde o começo do livro de uma maneira que faz você ficar imerso nessa linha de raciocínio onde algo tão cotidiano o quanto a alimentação tem um vasto significado na vida dela.
gosto de toda a desenvoltura inicial do livro, onde se descobre que ela saiu de uma vida onde sua alimentação vinha direto da fazenda para a sua mesa, fazendo seu passado contrastar com a ação de se revelar uma serial killer canibal que abraçou seu senso extremo de superioridade, o começo foi minha parte favorita.

sex and cannibalism (she’s so real for that)


DNF. a few lines did stick out to me. Just couldn’t get through it. Felt like it was trying a little to hard.

the highs and lows of womanhood am i right <3
Highlights

Run to its inevitable end, fecundity will always turn to decay.

I never saw Alex again. I’d made my decision, and I saw no need to pretend that it was anything other than the death of our relationship. In the end, it came down to this: Alex made me a better person, but I didn't like her. She bored me. I couldn't imagine forty more years with her. I saw her in my imagination, and I wanted to stab her through the heart with something thrilling and awful. So I killed the relationship instead.

This reason is symbolic. In the anthropological trade, it’s called cannibalistic essentialism: the idea that ingestion of human flesh imparts a crucial element.

To eat people is to get the taste of a Titan. It’s infinite immortalization. It makes a god out of a woman.

Ours is not one of them-no Western European culture openly embraces the eating of people (we will do it on the downlow, though; medicinal cannibalism lives into the twenty-first century). Even in the South Pacific, the cannibal capital of the world, not many cultures continue to practice traditions of cannibalism. It has been bludgeoned out of them, with religion, with laws, and with sticks.
literally a banger of a line

For another Giovanni's insides were out, and much of his outsides were gone trailing down a length of pipe a long metal rod, rebar, I remember some man calling it—sunk into the ground alongside the guardrails. The rebar stuck straight up as a monolith, stood rampant as a needle, gleaming with a dull metallic evil in the light of the pale moon. Impaled, Giovanni hung on the rebar, glistering ominously

The main thing that youth has going for it is porpoise-tight skin. Raw, wide-eyed newness is meaningless. Nostalgia for knowing nothing is asinine; you can't recapture it and you don't want to relive it. Better to sing a song of experience with your burning tiger's heart.

One of the wonderful things about true Italian men is that their default setting is about a cunt hair away from physical violence where their heterosexual bonds are concerned. I do enjoy men with a whiff of menace.

With our friends, our guard tumbles like acrobats, falls like leaves, and swirls in glittery, dusty eddies. That face we keep up in front of everyone else —family, lovers, husbands or children — we let slide. Our friends see the frailties, the insecurities, the unattractive bits that we have to keep hidden from the rest of the world because — and this is the meat of the matter — it’s hard work to be a woman.

Ask not for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for print media, and for me.

…to take our minds off life's real horrors, like the fact that the pesticides DuPont creates are in essence honeybee genocide.
was really not expecting a Monsanto / DuPont soapbox rant in this book… but here we are 😬

Emma and I loved each other with the ferocity borne of a twisted shared history. I have no other explanation for our relationship.

Yet women weren't always the angels in the house, and angels weren't always benevolent beings playing harps on the tops of trees. We like to forget that men imprisoned women in the house and expected gratitude in rreturn.




land of cock-and it does, the phallus dominates that city's skyline: Roman men strut with unquestioned self-confidence, their limbs decked in crimson, in mustard, in peacock blues and greens, each demanding your gaze but as much as the long penile lines of the skyscraper may define New York City, iť's a place that doesn't care who fucks whom, as long as you do it. Fucking, metaphorical or gla- w to m fe

I gave it a go; you know, when in Rome and all that-Boston was positively seething with lesbiansI don't like to be left free of a fad.

No man wears a sateen shirt without wanting to be petted
w o a h


My heart became a home, and I did not live there alone.

With that, I realized Id fallen in love. Because of egg coddlers. With a man I knew from college and had forgotten. It was wild, and I felt exhilarated. I sensed a stirring in the void where my soul Should have been-no great hatching of conscience but a flutter, a breath, a quickening.

In death, I am closer to them than I ever was in life. I carry them around with me. It's not as if I imagine I can hear them calling, but I do like to converse with their imagined voices. It amuses me to have them agree with me.

Talking to Andrew, I discovered that my assistant, while only marginally adept at her job, was spectacularly good at being the kind of woman who makes otherwise intelligent men lose their absolute shit. I always marvel at this sort of woman, the sort who accepts total, monogamous devotion like it's her birthright. To my experience, there’s nothing that unites these women- they can be smart as pinstripes or as dumb as fake fur, they can have the classic beauty of a perfectly ripe honey crisp apple or the compelling plainness of a pie. They tend to be skinny; perhaps their performance of appetite suggests comfort with deprivation. Maybe they dupe men into thinking that they, like air plants, don’t need nourishment to survive.