The Will to Change Men, Masculinity, and Love
Reviews

borrowed, serafin’s copy

This book reaches a lot of nuance in femminist theory that is often over looked or ommited. A really great read, both thoughtful and enjoyable to read.

Everyone should read this book. Understanding the patriarchy and what it really is has been super impactful for me. Bell Hooks describes the intricate nuances of a complex epidemic plaguing our world, in particular America. I feel far better equipped to handle my prejudices and patriarchal tendencies. This book didn’t make me feel overly guilty or felt like it was all my fault. But was a kind journey of urgent self reflection.

“Men need feminist thinking. It is a theory that supports their spiritual evolution and their shift away from the patriarchal model. Patriarchy is destroying the well being of men and taking their lives daily.”

I've always loved bell hooks, and this did not disappoint. Skillfully and lovingly infused a discussion about patriarchy and it's pitfalls with hope, empathy, and love. This was wonderful.

Another book club assignment about the prison that patriarchy traps men in. It details the unspoken death boys experience while developing into men when one learns to kill their emotions & sensitivities in order to become "masculine."

To everyone who cares deeply about the men in their lives, this book is for you.

One of the most important books I’ve ever read.

Essential reading for anyone wanting to understand toxic masculinity, daring to build alternatives and particularly for men who want love to flourish in their lives.















Highlights

Male domination does not allow mutual intimacy to emerge; it keps fathers from touching the hearts of their children

Mothers who ally themselves with patriarchy cannot love their sons rightly, for there will always come a moment when patriarchy will ask them to sacrifice their sons.

To truly protect and honor the emotional lives of bos we must challenge patriarchal culture. And until that culture changes, we must create the subcultures, the sanctuaries where boys can learn to be who they are uniquely, without being forced to conform to patriarchal masculine visions. To love boys rightly we must value their inner lives enough to construct worlds, both private and publc, where their right to wholeness can be consistently celebrated and affirmed, where their need to love and be loved can be fulfilled.

Patriarchy both creates the rage in boys and then contains it for later use, making it a resource to exploit later on as boys become men. As a national product, this rage can be garnered to further imperialism, hatred, and oppression of women and men globally. This rate is needed if boys are to become men willing to travel around the world to fight wars without ever demanding that other ways of solving conflict be found.

Only a revolution of values in our nation will end male violence, and that revolution will necessarily be based on a love ethic. To create loving men, we must love males. Loving maleness is different from praising and rewarding males for living up to sexist-defined notions of male identity. Caring about men because of what they do for us is not the same as loving males for simply being. When we love male- ness, we extend our love whether males are performing or not. Performance is different from simply being. In patriarchal culture males are not allowed simply to be who they are and to glory in cheir unique identity. Their value is always determined by what they do.

And there remains a small strain of feminist thinkers who feel strongly that they have given all they want to give to men; they are concerned solely with improving the collective welfare of women. Yet life has shown me that any time a single male dares to transgress patriarchal boundaries in order to love, the lives of women, men, and children are fundamentally changed for the better.

Fear keeps us from being close to the men in our lives; it keeps us from love.

While some women active in the feminist movement felt anguished about our collective inability to convert masses of men to feminist thinking, many women simply felt that feminism gave them permission to be indifferent to men, to turn away from male needs.

“When I first began looking at gender issues, I believed that violence was a by-product of boyhood socialization. But after listening more closely to men and their families, I have come to believe that violence IS boyhood socialization. The way we "turn boys into men" is through injury: We sever them from their guardians, research tells us, far too early. We pull them away from their own expressiveness, from their feelings, from sensitivity to others. The very phrase "Be a man" means suck it up and keep going. Disconnection is not fallout from traditional masculinity. Disconnection IS masculinity.”
OOF.