Blueprint

Blueprint The Evolutionary Origins of a Good Society

"A dazzlingly erudite synthesis of history, philosophy, anthropology, genetics, sociology, economics, epidemiology, statistics, and more" (Frank Bruni, New York Times), Blueprint shows how and why evolution has placed us on a humane path -- and how we are united by our common humanity. For too long, scientists have focused on the dark side of our biological heritage: our capacity for aggression, cruelty, prejudice, and self-interest. But natural selection has given us a suite of beneficial social features, including our capacity for love, friendship, cooperation, and learning. Beneath all our inventions -- our tools, farms, machines, cities, nations -- we carry with us innate proclivities to make a good society. In Blueprint, Nicholas A. Christakis introduces the compelling idea that our genes affect not only our bodies and behaviors, but also the ways in which we make societies, ones that are surprisingly similar worldwide. With many vivid examples -- including diverse historical and contemporary cultures, communities formed in the wake of shipwrecks, commune dwellers seeking utopia, online groups thrown together by design or involving artificially intelligent bots, and even the tender and complex social arrangements of elephants and dolphins that so resemble our own -- Christakis shows that, despite a human history replete with violence, we cannot escape our social blueprint for goodness. In a world of increasing political and economic polarization, it's tempting to ignore the positive role of our evolutionary past. But by exploring the ancient roots of goodness in civilization, Blueprint shows that our genes have shaped societies for our welfare and that, in a feedback loop stretching back many thousands of years, societies have shaped, and are still shaping, our genes today.
Sign up to use

Reviews

Photo of Nelson Zagalo
Nelson Zagalo@nzagalo
4 stars
Sep 3, 2022

No seu livro "Blueprint: The Evolutionary Origins of a Good Society" de 2019, Nicholas A. Christakis aborda a questão da formação das sociedades de uma perspectiva evolucionária. A abordagem seguida por Christakis é científica, mas não experimental de forma direta. Ou seja, usam-se múltiplos métodos de análise indireta do objeto, que permitem construir inferências que depois suportam a argumentação geral. Mas não existe uma forma de aceder empiricamente ao objeto da discussão, ou de o testar de forma completamente isolada. Para uma parte da academia, isto deita por terra o interesse deste trabalho, e considera-o mesmo uma afronta. Do meu ponto de vista, e de uma outra parte da academia, isso é miopia científica. ... ... continuar a ler no Virtual Illusion: https://virtual-illusion.blogspot.com...

Photo of Coleman McCormick
Coleman McCormick@coleman
4 stars
Aug 13, 2023
Photo of Róbert Istók
Róbert Istók@robertistok
5 stars
Mar 19, 2023
Photo of Mac Navarro
Mac Navarro@1xmac
5 stars
Mar 1, 2023
Photo of Keven Wang
Keven Wang@kevenwang
3 stars
Feb 4, 2023
Photo of Cristian Rus
Cristian Rus@cristianrus4
3 stars
Jul 29, 2021

Highlights

Photo of Mac Navarro
Mac Navarro@1xmac

People "go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one." People in crowds often act in thoughtless ways— shouting profanities, destroying property, throwing bricks, threatening others. This can come about partly because of a process known to psychologists as deindividuation: people begin to lose their self-awareness and sense of individual agency as they identify more strongly with the group, which often leads to antisocial behaviors they would never consider if they were acting alone. They can form a mob, cease to think for themselves, lose their moral compass, and adopt a classic us-versus-them stance that brooks no shared understanding.