
Chasing the Scream The First and Last Days of the War on Drugs
Reviews

I liked this book because I already kind of believed most of what he is selling, but I never quite had the evidence to back it up. It was interesting to learn about the history of prohibition. It was enlightening to read about the various places where drugs have been decriminalized or legalized and how well it has worked. The author does not just paint a pretty picture of what it could be like. He is realistic that there will always be people who will be addicted and people who can't help themselves. However, he shows worlds where the situation has improved greatly because of the law changes and the attitude changes of the citizens. Basically it comes down to the fact that drug users need help, not to be criminalized. Drug addicts are people, too, and we should treat them as such. The violence and other atrocious things that come with drugs will resolve themselves if we help the people in need.

Compelling and informative. Really makes you think how the world is working and how much power is too much power, especially when it falls into the wrong hands.

An interesting combination of things I’ve read elsewhere on the war on drugs. My main critique is that is overly long and repetitive and labours a few points. Having read a little on his plagiarism puts his credibility as an ethical person in question. While he makes some sensible recommendations one can clearly see there is way too much money and power at stake for this to become a reality. Until perhaps in some dystopian future it suits the powers that be to have their subjects in a permanently drugged compliant state.

The war on drugs is not a civil war. Americans say they want drugs and drug addiction squashed, but they also want to be able to get high when they want to. Keep the drugs out of the unsavory hands, but let me have fun, safe drugs when I want them. Lock up those stinking addicts and build more prison's to keep them locked up. This book calls for the end to the war. Johann Hari does not claim to have all the answers, just that our current approach is corrupt and not working. Interesting ideas.




















Highlights

As a result of this policy where tobacco is legal but increasingly socially disapproved of, cigarette smoking has fallen dramatically. In 1960 in the United States, according to the General Household Survey, 24 59 percent of men and 43 percent of women were smokers. Today, it’s 26 percent of men and 23 percent of women—a halving. There have been similar trends across the developed world. Just because something harmful is legal doesn’t mean people rush to use it: more and more are turning away from it.

In the United States alone, legalizing drugs would save $41 billion a year currently spent on arresting, trying, and jailing users and sellers, according to a detailed study by the Cato Institute. 31 If the drugs were then taxed at a similar rate to alcohol and tobacco, they would raise an additional $46.7 billion 32 a year, according to calculations by Professor Jeffrey Miron of the Department of Economics at Harvard University. That’s $87.8 billion next year, and every year. For that money, you could provide the Portuguese style of treatment and social reconnection for every drug addict in America.

Allan Parry, who worked for the local health authority, saw that patients who didn’t have a prescription were injecting smack with “brick dust in it, coffee, crushed bleach crystals, anything.”

“People overdose because 8 [under prohibition] they don’t know if the heroin is 1 percent or 40 percent . . . Just imagine if every time you picked up a bottle of wine, you didn’t know whether it was 8 percent alcohol or 80 percent alcohol [or] if every time you took an aspirin, you didn’t know if it was 5 milligrams or 500 milligrams.”

The modern world has many incredible benefits, but it also brings with it a source of deep stress that is unique: dislocation. “Being atomized and fragmented and all on [your] own—that’s no part of human evolution and it’s no part of the evolution of any society,” he told me.

So Bruce came to believe, as he put it, that “today’s flood of addiction 27 is occurring because our hyperindividualistic, frantic, crisis-ridden society makes most people feel social[ly] or culturally isolated. Chronic isolation causes people to look for relief. They find temporary relief in addiction . . . because [it] allows them to escape their feelings, to deaden their senses— and to experience an addictive lifestyle as a substitute for a full life.”

What they discovered was startling. It turned out that the rats in isolated cages used up to 25 milligrams of morphine a day, as in the earlier experiments. But the rats in the happy cages used hardly any morphine at all —less than 5 milligrams. “These guys [in Rat Park] have a complete total twenty-four-hour supply” of morphine, Bruce said, “and they don’t use it.” They don’t kill themselves. They choose to spend their lives doing other things.

In 1995, the World Health Organization 12 (WHO) conducted a massive scientific study of cocaine and its effects. They discovered that “experimental and occasional use are by far the most common types of use, and compulsive/dysfunctional [use] is far less common.” The U.S. government threatened to cut off funding to the WHO unless they suppressed the report. It has never been published; we know what it says only because it was leaked.

In Vietnam, the water buffalo have always shunned the local opium plants. They don't like them. But when the American bombs started to fall all around them during the war, the buffalo left their normal grazing grounds, broke into the opium fields, and began to chew. They would then look a little dizzy and dulled. When they were traumatized, it seems, they wanted-like the mongoose, like us— to escape from their thoughts.

“Of course the control of the drugs, the routes, is what gives them the money to pay off cops, military, federal police—everyone,” Juan told me. “If you legalize drugs they are going to lose a lot of money.” When they legalized alcohol in the United States, lots of gangsters were bankrupted. Would it be similar in Mexico, I ask him, if drugs were legalized? “Of course. There’s going to be less sources of money.”

“Of course the control of the drugs, the routes, is what gives them the money to pay off cops, military, federal police—everyone,” Juan told me. “If you legalize drugs they are going to lose a lot of money.” When they legalized alcohol in the United States, lots of gangsters were bankrupted. Would it be similar in Mexico, I ask him, if drugs were legalized? “Of course. There’s going to be less sources of money.”

Prohibition, Bourgois explains in his writing, creates a system in which the most insane and sadistic violence has a sane and functional logic. It is required. It is rewarded.

Under prohibition, he explains, if you are the first to abandon a moral restraint, you gain a competitive advantage over your rivals.

The 1993 National Household Survey 10 on Drug Abuse found that 19 percent of drug dealers were African American, but they made up 64 percent of the arrests for it.

When we hear about “drug-related violence,” we picture somebody getting high and killing people. We think the violence is the product of the drugs. But in fact, it turns out this is only a tiny sliver of the violence. The vast majority is like Chino’s violence—to establish, protect, and defend drug territory in an illegal market, and to build a name for being consistently terrifying so nobody tries to take your property or turf.

They explain that when a popular product is criminalized, it does not disappear. Instead, criminals start to control the supply and sale of the product. They have to get it into the country, transport it to where it’s wanted, and sell it on the street. At every stage, their product is vulnerable. If somebody comes along and steals it, they can’t go to the police or the courts to get it back. So they can only defend their property one way: by violence.

Henry Smith Williams urged the public to ask: Why would gangsters pay the cops to enforce the drug laws harder? The answer, he said, was right in front of our eyes. Drug prohibition put the entire narcotics industry into their hands. Once the clinics were closed, every single addict became a potential customer and cash cow.

“Imagine if the government chased sick people 248 with diabetes, put a tax on insulin and drove it into the black market, told doctors they couldn’t treat them,” she wrote in her memoir, “then sent them to jail. If we did that, everyone would know we were crazy. Yet we do practically the same thing every day in the week to sick people hooked on drugs.”

The man Anslinger sent to track and bust Billie Holiday had, it seems, fallen in love with her. Confronted with a real addict, up close, the hatred fell away.
fidel castro and the CIA agent (1959)