Factfulness The Ten Reason We're Wrong About the World--And Why Things Are Better Than You Think

I remember, during my early years as a university student, me and my friend once had a debate with a member of a well-known religious organization. We discussed about how to solve the Palestine problem, and what's shocking to me is that how simple thing was in his mind. To him, the solution was simple. "Why don't use military force to help liberate those Palestinian? Simple." I think it's kind of a joke but seeing his serious tone and voice, I guess he's dead serious. This book reminded me of that situation. One of the chapter of the book discuss about the instinct to see things as simple as possible. Seeing it only with a single perspective only. It's so tempting, it's so simple. To quote the book, "All problems have a single cause -- something we must always be completely against. Or all problems have a single solution -- something we must always be for. Everything is simple. There's just one small issue. We completely misunderstand the world." In fact, this single perspective instinct is just one of the reasons we're so wrong about the world we live in. There are The Gap Instinct, The Negativity, The Straight Line, The Fear, The Size, The Generalization, The Destiny, The Blame, and the Urgency Instinct. Each of the instinct is our tendency when we are confronted with some news, articles, data, questionnaires, etc. Something that seems, in our mind, has made the world unsafe than ever before. Seeing how hoaxes and news circulated everywhere on social media, it seems more true than ever. The world is on fire, and the good old days has indeed left us. But in reality, that's not the case. The world is safer, and in better condition. While it's true that global warming and terrorism is on the rise (not to mention the current pandemic condition, which left us exhausted and anxious) but overall, things are better than if we compared with, say, 20 or 30 years ago. I mean, just think about it. The risk of a global thermonuclear war is much higher 30 years ago than it's now. Not to mention the chaotic condition we Indonesians felt on the early years of the second millennium. It's much more stable now. Sure, we still got lots of problems to tackle with, but indeed, we, both as a nation and a global community, have some progress that worth recognize for. In conclusion, this book doesn't want us to be a pessimist, but it doesn't want us to be a highly optimistic person too. The goals of the book is, to taught us about having a rational, clear view of the world based on data, and to use it so that we can be much more constructive to help shape our world. And the book serves it well. In memory of Hans Rosling. -- Thank you Sany for the book --

the most important book!

I didn't personally particularly like this book or find it to be useful. However, I can easily imagine the type of person who would. If you're someone who feels overwhelmed to the point of paralysis by the news cycle, your anxiety levels spike every time there's a mass shooting, or if you're someone who has difficulty putting reported numbers into context (and maybe struggled a lot with word problems in school), I think Factfulness might be helpful to you. There's a lot of basic, yet practical, advice about how to think about statistics (don't look at numbers in isolation, proportions will always be more useful, most things fall into distributions rather than discrete categories, and so on) as well as reminders about how people tend to be drawn to big flashy stories of disaster and that complex problems have no singular cause and no magic bullet solutions. As for my issues: I generally consider myself an ignoramus when it comes to topics surrounding global poverty. Before I started reading Factfulness, I'd say my grasp of the key issues is average at best. Turns out I'm much more accurately informed than average. It's a strange experience reading book with the premise that everything I know is wrong and the truth will blow my mind when I'm mostly right; I felt a little condescended to. I feel like it's relevant to mention that my academic background is in anthropology, which means I've had "every assumption about people you've ever had is probably wrong" thoroughly drilled into my head. It also means that the need to deconstruct progress narratives has been drilled into my head, and well, Factfulness is nothing if not one giant progress narrative, where, if all goes according to the destiny of human progress, communities pass through income levels (at one point compared to a video game), their citizens finally achieving the 'modern' lifestyles currently enjoyed by people like myself. The author is very fond of writing things like 'people in x country live like people in y country 100 years ago'. The problem with all of this is that much of the 'progress' of United Kingdom, of the United States, and so on was made possible through slavery, colonialism, and the outsourcing of labor especially with regard to infrastructure, and if certain high levels of consumption are happening, someone's in a sweatshop somewhere. This is wholly swept under the rug. I also rolled my eyes at the constant exhortations directed towards American/Swedish businesspeople to start marketing their products to the emergent African consumer markets; not because those consumer markets don't exist, but because it's just so... colonialist. And then one starts probing the numbers and they're not wrong exactly, just intentionally gotcha-y and occasionally a little weaselly.

This book is very interesting, especially for the ones that think the world is worst. I would say that the main message is to be careful with our perceptions. Having a fact based world would be better for us all, and we need data for that alongside with our decoupling from our bubble.

We should teach this book in school,university and everywhere In addition to the facts correction about the world, two important points you will learn in this book First: how to think about the facts thrown in our face every single day in our life from everyone, in daily conversations, media, internet, friends ,.. Imagine if you tried to think about all facts using the same methods mentioned in the book , how many more you will need to revise The second point is "progress" : how to measure progress correctly , maybe the current progress in comparison to the end goal is not enough (usually it's never enough ) but still it's important and needed to compared to the initial state over time , it gives hope, there is a chance , maybe there is a hope after all

As you can find out from earlier reviews, the book is such a delight to read. The authors talks about what it is relevant on the big picture and give you hope based on data and numbers. The authors started with a test witch bunch a questions, similar to the ones in Hans' TED talk, and shows how based on the answers given by different people, majority gets totally wrong, in fact opposite. The majority think the world is getting worse, while the opposite is true. They present this 10 tools, if you may call it, to give us a toolbox to get better in understanding the world. What I like about how they are presenting these instincts/biases not as if it is something they haven't done it themselves. Hans give couple of examples where he judged someone or a situation and how he can fall into the traps of what he is actively trying to educate us. I appreciate this and it puts the writer in the same boat as us the readers. I like to thank the authors for creating this great work.

I recommend this to everyone who’s interested in a deeper understanding of the world through numbers and charts

Must read. Not because of the facts presented themselves (although just knowing some of them appear worse than they really are, brings some comfort), but because of the mindset shift it proposes from our conditioned minds of many years getting the facts from the media only. It seems even more important in the current phase we live in (covid pandemic) that we should live a more fact-based life, and together, in this state of mind, we could clear the air of all the toxicity we see and feel every day.

I would say this book is a classic and I might just use it as a means to teach the kids a thing or two. Using conversational language, the book sucked me in, it was like having a conversation with the late Dr Rosling himself, you can feel as though he is there guiding you like a patient Professor during a class discussion. Having been in the medical background myself, it all felt familiar and relatable. Upon completion of the book, I felt like that medical student who left the class discussion with an increased level of confidence to look at the world. It is truly a gem and this will be one of my re-reads from time to time again. Highly recommend.

Thought provoking, easy to read and conversation sparking. Will definitely change the way you think about the world!

1. In all low-income countries across the world today, how many girls finish primary school? 2. Where does the majority of the world population live? 3. In the last 20 years, the proportion of the world population living in extreme poverty has… 4. What is the life expectancy of the world today? 5. There are 2 billion children in the world today, aged 0 to 15 years old. How many children will there be in the year 2100, according to the United Nations? 6. The UN predicts that by 2100 the world population will have increased by another 4 billion people. What is the main reason? 7. How did the number of deaths per year from natural disasters change over the last hundred years? ... Only 10% of people scored better than random guessing on these questions, the most important trends of the last hundred years. How can it be that we are both 1) a rabidly overconfident species and 2) an extremely pessimistic species that generally gets these simple, objective questions very wrong (doing far worse than random)? Sure, we could just be dogmatic nihilists or idiots, but that doesn't fit that well. A stunning 15% of humans managed to pick the wrong answer on all twelve questions. That’s almost impossible for a monkey to achieve. It requires systematic misconceptions. The problem here is not the lack of correct knowledge. The problem is the presence of wrong “knowledge”. To score this bad requires a false perception of the world, that make you pick the wrong answer systematically. Rosling explains it in terms of cognitive biases: we suffer from a dramatic worldview, binarised, conflict-obsessed, and blamey. People seem to find Development - the completely unprecedented explosion of survival, freedom, and dignity for the larger part of the entire world! - boring. (You could blame the media, but Rosling persuasively argues that they too are an epiphenomenon of our evolved fear and narrowness.) Your most important challenge in developing a fact-based worldview is to realize that most of your firsthand experiences are from Level 4 [the top 10% of global income]; and that your secondhand experiences are filtered through the mass media, which loves nonrepresentative extraordinary events and shuns normality. When you live on Level 4, everyone on Levels 3, 2, and 1 can look equally poor, and the word poor can lose any specific meaning... Anyone who has looked down from the top of a tall building knows that it is difficult to assess from there the differences in height of the buildings nearer the ground. They all look kind of small... It is natural to miss the distinctions between the people with cars, the people with motorbikes and bicycles, the people with sandals, and the people with no shoes at all. On the shocking lack of empiricism even in the most important places like medicine and policy: In the 1960s, the success of the recovery position inspired new public health advice, against most traditional practices, to put babies to sleep on their tummies... Even though the data showed that sudden infant deaths went up, not down, it wasn’t until 1985 that a group of pediatricians in Hong Kong actually suggested that the prone position might be the cause. Even then, doctors in Europe didn’t pay much attention. It took Swedish authorities another seven years to accept their mistake and reverse the policy... With my own hands, over a decade or so, I turned many babies from back to tummy to prevent suffocation and save lives. So did many other doctors and parents throughout Europe and the United States, until the advice was finally reversed, 18 months after the Hong Kong study was published. Thousands of babies died because of a sweeping generalization, including some during the months when the evidence was already available. Two hundred ninety-two brave young feminists had traveled to Stockholm from across the world to coordinate their struggle to improve women's access to education. But only 8 percent knew that 30-year-old women have spent on average only one year less in school than 30-year-old men. Bad incentives and noble lies are another reason for the stubborn gloom of intellectuals: There has been progress in human rights, animal protection, women's education, climate awareness, catastrophe relief, and many other areas where activists raise awareness by saying that things are getting worse. Relentlessly sensible: resist blaming any one individual or group of individuals for anything. Because the problem is that when we identify the bad guy, we are done thinking. And it’s almost always more complicated than that. It’s almost always about multiple interacting causes—a system. If you really want to change the world, you have to understand how it actually works and forget about punching anyone in the face. I've been studying Development for years and this still taught me plenty. It should shock you into awareness and hopefully more. Paying too much attention to the individual visible victim rather than to the numbers can lead us to spend all our resources on a fraction of the problem, and therefore save many fewer lives. This principle applies anywhere we are prioritizing scarce resources. It is hard for people to talk about resources when it comes to saving lives, or prolonging or improving them Doing so is often taken for heartlessness. Yet so long as resources are not infinite—and they never are infinite—it is the most compassionate thing to do to use your brain and work out how to do the most good with what you have. One of the "five books that represent my worldview": moral passion, strict empiricism, psychological depth, existential hope. I picked this rather than Enlightenment Now or Rational Optimist or Doing Good Better or Our World In Data or Whole Earth Discipline (out of the contemporary literature of progress) because it also covers heuristics and biases - and so substitutes / complements Kahneman, Taleb, Hanson, and Yudkowsky, without (what people insist on seeing as) their self-superior wonkishness. Thank you industrialization, thank you steel mill, thank you power station, thank you chemical-processing industry, for giving us the time to read books. In a sense he stays on the surface - this isn't the full radical evolutionary account of Elephant in the Brain , instead just noting some bad epistemic practices and gesturing at evolutionary theory. But that said, there's a "charity is not about helping" bit: If I check the World Wildlife Fund I can see how, despite declines in some local populations, the total wild populations of tigers, giant pandas, and black rhinos have all increased over the past years. It was worth paying for all those pandas stickers on the doors all around Stockholm. Yet only 6% of the Swedish public knows that their support has had any effect. But despite all the suffering and error and backfiring efforts he describes, he is trying to make you realise how good things could be: Could everyone have a fact-based worldview one day? Big change is always difficult to imagine. But it is definitely possible, and I think it will happen, for two simple reasons. First: a fact-based worldview is more useful for navigating life, just like an accurate GPS is more useful for finding your way in the city. Second, and probably more important: a fact-based worldview is more comfortable. It creates less stress and hopelessness than the dramatic worldview, simply because the dramatic one is so negative and terrifying. When we have a fact-based worldview, we can see that the world is not as bad as it seems— and we can see what we have to do to keep making it better. This, then, is the same message as Sagan, 25 years ago: the emotional gain of reason. --- Misc notes - Binary categories are often unhelpful because they obscure continuum. Rosling ranted against "developed" / "developing" for 20 years. The World Bank has caught on but the UN haven't. - He is a better messenger for the cognitive bias alarm, for activists anyway, because of his deep credibility: he mucked in to anti-poverty measures for decades. Some of his anecdotes are chilling. I could tell you countless stories of the nonsense I saw in Cuba: the local moonshine, a toxic fluorescent concoction brewed inside TV tubes using water, sugar, and babies’ poopy diapers to provide the yeast required for fermentation; the hotels that hadn’t planned for any guests and so had no food, a problem we solved by driving to an old people’s home and eating their leftovers from the standard adult food rations; my Cuban colleague who knew his children would be expelled from university if he sent a Christmas card to his cousin in Miami; the fact that I had to explain my research methods to Fidel Castro personally to get approval. I will restrain myself and just tell you why I was there and what I discovered. - "I do not believe that fake news is the major culprit for our distorted worldview: we haven’t only just started to get the world wrong, I think we have always gotten it wrong." - "In the car industry, cars are recalled when a mistake is discovered. You get a letter from the manufacturer saying, “We would like to recall your vehicle and replace the brakes.” When the facts about the world that you were taught in schools and universities become out of date, you should get a letter too: “Sorry, what we taught you is no longer true. Please return your brain for a free upgrade.” "

Very insightful book.

An excellent book! I couldn't put it down and it was a very easy read. If you have watched Hans Rosling's TED talks, you already know the gist but the book was pretty entertaining. All of the anecdotes that brought life to the facts were fun to read. If you imagine the text in Hans' accent, with all his enthusiasm in sharing ideas, you will love the book. The only thing that makes me sad is that it's going to be hard for me to find another fun book like this to read!

Solid read about global trends through the lens of a framework for critical data analysis and assumption-busting. Peppered with many enlightening and humorous (occasionally grave) stories from his work as a public health researcher - you know when a book about statistics starts with a story about sword swallowing you're off to a good start. See if you can beat my 9/12 in the quiz ;)

A must read piece. It inspires the reader to take a fact-based approach to our world view. And it helps to deactivate our flawed cognitive biases when we try to understand abstract realities concerning Humanity’s present.

Data as therapy, for sure. As expected, the authors drew from a wealth of data to make a level-headed case without any exaggeration. The book was also very concise and to the point. I was completely sold by the authors' empathy. The duality of being able to hold space for people who struggle today vs being able to put things in context over a long term was quite impressive. I highly recommend this book.

Imagine making decisions and judgements based on what we knew from the 1940s: we’d say, hopelessly out of date, behind the times, not modern. Yet, when it comes to fundamental world facts—poverty, education, population—Hans proves, via surveys included in the book, that most “Westerners” are doing just that. He identifies 10 biases that were once useful for our survival, but are now distorting our world view such that we cannot are the reality of improvements around us — or focus on real threats to our future. A must read.

Everyone please read this

One of the best frameworks for how to think about (and understand) the world I’ve ever come across.

Nos últimos anos tenho-me posicionado cada vez mais do lado dos céticos em relação a análises do real a partir de números. Para isso muito tem contribuído a voragem a que todos vamos sendo submetidos por meios de avaliação que não levam em conta quem somos, mas apenas o que debitamos em termos de resultados numa folha de Excel. Por isso mesmo, não fosse a enorme recomendação feita ao livro, por Bill Gates entre outros, dificilmente lhe teria pegado. Reconheço que aprendi muito com Hans Rosling, mas a minha impressão em relação a números, métricas e estatísticas não se alterou, aliás Hans acaba por sem se dar conta dar razão ao trabalho de Daniel Kahneman a propósito da economia comportamental, e do modo como as pessoas simplesmente munidas de números pensam poder compreender o ser humano. Com isto não quero dizer que o trabalho de Hans seja mau ou irrelevante, ele é imensamente relevante e o livro vale a leitura para todos, mas deve ser lido com muito espírito crítico. O resto da análise pode ser lida no VI em: https://virtual-illusion.blogspot.com...

AAAAAA we are out of the reading slump laid ease!!! As for the book itself: really liked the author's thesis (the world isn't perfect but we've made considerable progress that's worth celebrating! Not all hope is lost!) and how he presented it using accessible language and neat graphs + data sets. Might sound too idealistic but maybe this is what I needed to stop being consumed by my emotions and cognitive biases 🤠

Very insightful book especially if you're feeling lost in all the negative (fake) news that you hear and read on a daily basis. The author describes perfectly and in a very accessible way his concepts and ideas. Definitely one of my favorite books this year.

Aslında yanlış bildiğimiz ve önyargıyla yorum yaptığımız 10 tane temel yargıyı analiz ediyor. İsveç'li Toplum Sağlığı Dolktoru olan yazar dünyamızın her sorununu henüz çözmediğini ancak işlerin sürekli daha iyiye gittiğini göstermeye çalışıyor. Bizler ve onlar, dünya daha iyiye gitmiyor, devamlı böyle gider, rakamlara bakarak genelleme yapmak, mukayese yapmamak, kaderimiz buymuş demek, tek açıdan bakmak, başkalarını suçlamak

368 pages long TED talk.