Reviews
Book 1 Review: 2stars It just hit me that i should have picked the single edition and not omnibus one, now i'm reading three books for one. ugh pot of beans life. That aside, I DID NOT ENJOY THIS BOOK!! yeah there were some parts which were sort of enjoyable, where i had a glimmer of what was going on but for the most part you're just going in blind. Imagine someone opens up a door and slams it shut before you get your bearings, that's how you get to view this book. You get a rough understanding of what is going on, but mainly, you're just stumbling through wondering why the hell you picked up the book in the first place (which was how i felt for the most part of this book) Also i absolutely detested the first person narrative in the book. We had the pleasure of reading this book from Croaker's narrative, who happens to be the Annalist of the Black Company's POV. While i no longer blacklist books (yes, i was that finicky) simply for being in first person narrative, i absolutely do not understand why every single thing has to be from Croaker and there's a shit load of characters in the book. why on earth am i subjected to one person's narrative for over 300 pages??? Don't get me wrong, Croaker isn't a bad character but it would have been great to get some other character's perspective on things. All in all, not a good start to this series. Book 2 Review: 3 Stars Ok, im going to be honest, i still don't see what the "epicness" of this book is.. Anyways i definitely enjoyed this way more than i did book 1 mainly because i wasn't just getting Croaker's views on everybody..I don't know about you guys but it's kind of hard to fall in love with characters that you don't know... Kinda excited to know how book 3 ends though.. so i'm definitely going to pick that up soon. Book 3 Review: 4 Stars Yeah i actually really enjoyed the 3rd book of this series. I know a lot of people just can't seem to get into this book and it's really not their fault. So here's basically my negatives on this book: Croaker's POV: Reason with me people: Why on earth would you name a book Chronicles of the Black Company, if we don't get to meet the Black Company. Is Croaker the whole black company?? How is it that only about a handful of the Black Company get names? Are you telling me just One Eye, Goblin, Silent, Otto (i only remembered this name cos it was mentioned in book 3 again), Elmo?? Eldo?? The Captain and the lieutenant were the only people worth mentioning? and it's not like you actually get to meet them.. No seriously how do you have characters of such scope and get the PoV of ONE PERSON. ONE PERSON!!! for the whole gaddamn black company. That's not even the most annoying part, whatever doesn't interest Croaker he doesn't take time describe. Dude is a terrible narrator. He leaves the good stuff out and his descriptions are basically lacking flair. Case in point, his description of the battle in Rusts "Weapons Clanged. Arrows flew. Horses Shrieked" The end.. that was the battle!! I'm not sure why Glen Cook made a central character who for all intents and purposes didn't care enough to give us the facts on the matter. Reading Croaker's perspective it's easy to think the author's writing is shit, which it is for the most part but in Book 2 and 3, the writer introduces not sure if it's 2nd or 3rd Person Pov for other characters not in the Black Company and it's brilliant. There's also the additional negative of not knowing what happens if Croaker doesn't witness an event. Case in point in book 1 at the battle of Charms. "I wakened less frightened but hardly confident...One-Eye appeared almost immediately. 'You allright?' 'Yeah i'm fine' 'You missed a hell of a show' I raised an eyebrow. 'The circle and the Taken went at it after your lights went out. Only stopped a while ago..' UGH!!! Time Line: Frankly the time line was a mess.Croaker mentions in passing, in certain parts how much time has gone in parts but lord almighty. You'd be reading the book thinking everone was on the same timeline and croaker's part would pop up and he'd go, oh it's been months or years and you're just like..what?? how?? when?? How did Darling have time to organise a well formed rebel group: So basically you're told almost through out the start of book 3 that the black company has been on the run, hiding and shit. They make it to the plain of fear where Croaker says they've been for years and are basically outside communication is bordering on sparse to non-existent but somehow, no explanation, nothing. Darling somehow manages to assemble a well organised network of rebels. Yeeeeeeeeeeah, i get Glen Cook. Seriuosly Underwhelming Descriptions/ Underwhelming shock value: Let's start with the Dominator. This supposedly "bad ass, will crush the world and darkness will forever reign" baddy. We've been regaled with tales of his supposed evilness from book 1. Then finally we get to meet this evil personified and this is what we get: "The other boasted a sleeping man. A big man and handsome but with the mark of the beast upon him even in repose. A face full of hot hatred, of the anger of defeat" Like seriously. that's it? Let's circle back to this "mark of the beast thing" which i'm not even sure what it's supposed to be. Was Cook talking about the mark of the beast in the bible? is there some sort of universal mark of the beast we're all supposed to know about? - Another underwhelming part was the Lady killing off some of the Taken "The Lady called upon that power she held over them and they ceased to be Taken" Cook is unable to present shock value, like he'd just drop a bomb in the book that would ordinarily make you go HOLY SHIT!! in other books, but for him the presentation would be bland. Leading to disappointment and it's so frustrating because you as the reader actually recognise these parts as important moments. So probably wondering why book 3 is 4Stars. Well despite Cook's best attempts (and believe me he went hard) to sabotage himself, brilliant story telling does manage to shine through especially when Croaker wasn't narrating everything. That being said, Croaker wasn't all shit guys. Somehow he managed to present another view of The Lady that absolutely made me fall in love with her. Seriously that woman was bad ass and a genius.Not sure why the 3rd book is named "The White Rose" because quite frankly this book was all about the lady. All in all i actually think this book isn't unreadable and i'll definitely continue with the series Overall stars for all 3 books - 3 Stars
Sadly, I didn't get attached to these characters the way I did with The Malazan Book of the Fallen - but maybe that's because I just really want to go back and re-read that series... STILL, this was quality mercenary fantasy! A nice little twist on the classic good vs evil trope, but I don't think it was the best choice to write this in first person POV and largely with the same person through these three books.
