Forgot I read this for English as well I think im js too dumb to understand the book and the font cook gave us was bad as well but !!

This fucker loves boats.

Other than being on constant alert for Apocalypse Now connections, I really enjoyed this story. The very end of the era where there were still undiscovered places on the globe always fascinates me and this trip down (up?) the Congo really scratched that itch.

I should be loyal to the nightmare of my choice.

I did not like this nearly as much as I enjoyed Youth. One can definitely tell that they were written by the same author, but where Youth's beautiful and belabored prose served the story, here I think it was a disservice—the prose was so circuitous I often lost the story in it. The heart of darkness is about what is unknown, the "darkness of the map" and places unexplored by colonizers, but also death. Kurtz's death obviously is what the entire story is driving at, but also the death of the man in the accountants cabin, and the helmsman's death.

As I often do when I read classics, which sometimes are slightly hard to approach, I alternated between reading this book and listening to it. Kenneth Branagh is a superb narrator who really brought this book to life. For the rest: Review of paperback edition.

As I often do when I read classics, which sometimes are slightly hard to approach, I alternated between reading this book and listening to Heart of Darkness. Kenneth Branagh is a superb narrator who really brought this book to life. And as most classic books that have entered popular culture, this novella was very different from what I imagined. Obviously, the film Apocalypse Now! had given me certain expectations, but also the video games Far Cry 2 and Spec Ops: The Line (which are both recommended). The book surely weaves a rising sense of an uncanny feeling of dread, a descent into the darkness of one man’s (or two men, if the narrator is included?) madness and of course that of the African jungle, where savages both black and white await. When Mr. Kurtz was encountered, though, I couldn’t help but feel a little underwhelmed. This is mostly the fault of pop culture and myself, but my expectations were perhaps a bit more climactic and cathartic. After completing the book, it didn’t make me think as much as the aforementioned adaptations did. Still, a riveting enough read, and at least one star added for the fantastic narration.

so perfect

i feel like i didn't need to read that at all to be frank

What a mess. I couldn't concentrate on this book at all because it's so convoluted. Once again I don't see the greatness in it.

** spoiler alert ** He inspired uneasiness. There is a taint of death, a flavor of mortality in lies,—which is exactly what I hate and detest in the world—what I want to forget. No, it is impossible; it is impossible to convey the life-sensation of any given epoch of one's existence,—that which makes its truth, its meaning—its subtle and penetrating essence. It is impossible. We live, as we dream—alone. To tear treasure out of the bowels of the land was their desire, with no more moral purpose at the back of it than there is in burglars breaking into a safe. "Going up that river was like traveling back to the earliest beginnings of the world, when vegetation rioted on the earth and the big trees were kings. One can't live with one's finger everlastingly on one's pulse. "His was an impenetrable darkness. I looked at him as you peer down at a man who is lying at the bottom of a precipice where the sun never shines. The most you can hope from it is some knowledge of yourself—that comes too late—a crop of unextinguishable regrets.

I read this for a class, and liked it. Would probably love it if I read it again (and didn't have to write a paper on it).

Not a book for the faint-hearted, as the anti-H.O.D. critics would prove. Nonetheless, this book is my all-time favourite! From the complexities of narration and setting to themes and content, this book didn’t fail to please, never mind it’s challenging nature. Nothing about it was an easy read, but in a short few pages Conrad managed to unpack a whole corrupt world, along with character flaws and the role of nature. H.O.D is an intriguing book which keeps you on your toes the whole way through. Please please please make sure you read a summary first though, as having a decent understanding (or not) can make or break this book.

Had to read it for class. Did not enjoy.

Has really poignant moments and I recognize why it is considered such an important text in post-colonial studies, but overall, not for me.

Re-read this book after last reading it in high school. Read it in one sitting, while listening to the audiobook at the same time. This would seem to be the ideal way to read it, as that is the way Marlow tells the story, in one sitting to his companions while waiting for high tide in London. I enjoyed it much more than I remembered. There is so much complexity in this book that I am sure I will need to read it again to catch everything. An exploration of Europe's colonization of Africa, of the "white man's burden," of how an individual copes with the inhumane and still remains human. This book has earned a place on my permanent shelf.

2,5 Un classico con sicuramente intriso in significato storico, filosofico e umano importante, ma non mi aveva convinto ai tempi del liceo e non l'ha fatto ora.

Hated it! If you would like to know why, read Chinua Achebe's brilliant essay "An Image of Africa: Racism Conrad's 'Heart of Darkness'".

4 Stars Heart of Darkness a love it or hate type of book. It's not for everyone, and I can see why so many people cannot stand this book. Despite being a very short book, it is dense and slow. There is almost no plot. And the fact that many people read this as assigned reading increases their loathing. But if you can get past that, there is something beautiful here. Heart of Darkness may not have as high a standing among other Classics, but there is a reason why has stuck around. What I loved most about this book were Conrad's descriptions. His writing is beautiful. Like many old works, his words have a cultured quality that most modern language completely lacks. That is why I love reading classics. They tap into a lexis that people no longer bother with and are overall more poetic. Conrad's words are a wonderful balance of elegance, erudition, and perception. Here are some examples: “It seems to me I am trying to tell you a dream--making a vain attempt, because no relation of a dream can convey the dream-sensation, that commingling of absurdity, surprise, and bewilderment in a tremor of struggling revolt, that notion of being captured by the incredible which is of the very essence of dreams...No, it is impossible; it is impossible to convey the life-sensation of any given epoch of one's existence--that which makes its truth, its meaning--its subtle and penetrating essence. It is impossible. We live, as we dream-alone...” “You know I hate, detest, and can't bear a lie, not because I am straighter than the rest of us, but simply because it appalls me. There is a taint of death, a flavor of mortality in lies - which is exactly what I hate and detest in the world - what I want to forget.” “Droll thing life is -- that mysterious arrangement of merciless logic for a futile purpose. The most you can hope from it is some knowledge of yourself -- that comes too late -- a crop of inextinguishable regrets.” “I don't like work--no man does--but I like what is in the work--the chance to find yourself. Your own reality--for yourself not for others--what no other man can ever know. They can only see the mere show, and never can tell what it really means.” “They trespassed upon my thoughts. They were intruders whose knowledge of life was to me an irritating pretense, because I felt so sure they could not possibly know the things I knew. Their bearing, which was simply the bearing of commonplace individuals going about their business in the assurance of perfect safety, was offensive to me like the outrageous flaunting of folly in the face of a danger it is unable to comprehend. I had no particular desire to enlighten them, but I had some difficulty in restraining myself from laughing in their faces, so full of stupid importance.” The story has a suspenseful element but it is by no means a Thriller. It does not have the flashy formulaic structure that modern Suspense stories do. Rather, this is a slow burn. A first person narrative that seems simply at first - just a traveling companion relaying his experiences - but it slowly builds not towards some epic action or plot twist. No, it builds inward looking deep into the heart and mind. More than just pretty words, there is a psychological depth. It also features beautiful symbolism. The dominate symbolism of Darkness might seem overdone at times but I thought it was wonderfully done. As with most old writing, it might seem time dated to some. People often get caught up when old writing contains terms considered politically correct any more. But that does not make the writing racist. Heart of Darkness contains cultural and societal commentary - that evil inside all of us. The ironic juxtaposition of the white Europeans trying to "civilize the savages" while at the same time devolving into barbaric actions. It also looks into Imperialism. This book was written at a time when the Europeans were divvying up Africa with no regards to the indigenous people. Conrad put his own personal experiences and views of colonization into this story. So while some of the language and attitudes seem very out of line with twenty-first century political correctness, it really needs to be emphasized that Conrad was basically villainizing colonization. Unfortunately many of these issues still apply all these years later. So while the story may not have a guns blazing plot, it is beautifully written and has a deeper message. It is a must read for any lover of classic literature. “But his soul was mad. Being alone in the wilderness, it had looked within itself and, by heavens I tell you, it had gone mad.” “He struggled with himself, too. I saw it -- I heard it. I saw the inconceivable mystery of a soul that knew no restraint, no faith, and no fear, yet struggling blindly with itself.” RATING FACTORS: Ease of Reading: 3 Stars Writing Style: 5 Stars Originality: 5 Stars Character Development: 4 Stars Plot Structure and Development: 3 Stars Use of Literary Devices: 5 Stars

The Heart of Darkness is a novel encapsulated in adventure, existential thought, darkness, and inquisitiveness. The book follows the journey of Marlow and his recollection of memories once serving as a steamboat captain along the dangerous bends of Congo river. It's written as a frame narrative (story within a story), which does demand attentiveness considering the story often jumps in and out of first-person account, philosophical pondering, and so on. Light and darkness is explored predominantly throughout, as is the duality of human nature (albeit pessimistic at times). I'll more than likely come back and read this again one day - as it's full of themes and underlying currents which only several reads allow for. This book is small in length, but long and rich in content.

(audiobook)

I wasn't really a fan of this book. I think this is one of those that would have been easier to read if someone was guiding me along. It was on my "to read" list, so I dragged through it. I would like to look more into the history of this book and read some things about it, then maybe I'll have a better respect for it.

Couldn't get into it. Only read a little bit for school.

DNF!