
Recognizing the Stranger On Palestine and Narrative
Reviews

the afterword ringing in my ears




Highlights

Palestinianism was for Said a condition of chronic exile, exile as agony but also as ethical position. To remain aloof from the group while honouring one's organic ties to it; to exist between loneliness and alignment, remaining always a bit of a stranger; to resist the resolution of the narrative, the closing of the circle; to keep looking, to not feel too at home.

Said asks us to recognise the familiar as stranger. He gestures at a way to dismantle the consoling fictions of fixed identity, which make it easier to herd into groups. This might be easier said than done, but it's provocative - it points out how many narratives of self, when applied to a nation-state, might one day harden into self-centred intolerance.

The word epiphany itself comes from the Koine Greek word epipháneia, meaning manifestation or appearance, derived from the verb phainein, meaning to appear. It is usually applied in ancient Greek contexts to three things: the first is dawn, the second is the appearance of an enemy army, and the third is the manifestation of a deity.

Some of us read them for comfort, or to escape; some to learn about the world; some because it's a rare chance for concentrated solitude, to be neither working nor passively consuming the content of a screen but thinking deeply about experiences other than our own, using some of the tools of our dream life, and listening carefully to the voices of others, in ways that ask for our imaginative participation and that might also shed light upon our own experiences of being alive on this planet. Novels reflect the perpetuation of a human impulse to use and experience narrative form as a way of making sense of the world.

What in fiction is enjoyable and beautiful is often terrifying in real life. In real life, shifts in collective understanding are necessary for major changes to occur, but on the human, individual scale, they are humbling and existentially disturbing. Such shifts also do not usually come without a fight; not everyone can be unpersuaded of their worldview through argument and appeal, or through narrative. Maggie Nelson, in The Art of Cruelty, punctures the high-minded moralism of art that seeks, through depicting suffering, to move an audience to do something about it. “Having a strong reaction is not the same thing as having an understanding,” she writes, “and neither is the same thing as taking action.” It’s true that emotion and understanding are not the same as action, but you might say that understanding is necessary for someone to act.
Thinking a lot about what narrative can and can’t do. Grateful to Isabella Hammad for her thinking and connections here.

Do not give in. Be like the Palestinians in Gaza. Look them in the face. Say: that's me!
Mahmoud Darwish tells us: 'Gaza does not propel people to cool contemplation; rather she propels them to erupt and collide with the truth.' The Israeli government would like to destroy Palestine, but they are mistaken if they think this is really possible. Palestine is in Haifa. Palestine is in Jerusalem. Palestine is in Gaza and Palestine is in the Mediterranean Sea and Palestine is alive in the refugee camps, from Shatila to Yarmouk. Palestine is even alive and well in New York. Do they really believe they can obliterate the Palestinian will to life?