Name: Prince of thorns
ISBN: 9780441020324

Mark Lawrence

After witnessing the murder of his mother and brother and leading a band of bloodthirsty thugs, Prince Honorous Jorg Ancrath returns to his father's castle and his birthright, but faces treachery and dark magic once he arrives.

Prince of thorns

When he was nine, he watched as his mother and brother were killed before him. By the time he was thirteen, he was the leader of a band of bloodthirsty thugs. By fifteen, he intends to be king...

It’s time for Prince Honorous Jorg Ancrath to return to the castle he turned his back on, to take what’s rightfully his. Since the day he hung pinned on the thorns of a briar patch and watched Count Renar’s men slaughter his mother and young brother, Jorg has been driven to vent his rage. Life and death are no more than a game to him—and he has nothing left to lose.

But treachery awaits him in his father’s castle. Treachery and dark magic. No matter how fierce his will, can one young man conquer enemies with power beyond his imagining?

Prince of Thorns

Chris Hilyer

This was fast and fun. I'll definitely finish the trilogy.

shelby mosel

Prashanth Srivatsa

Dark and gritty, the Prince of Thorns weaves a tale of vengeance in the midst of political warfare, a bloodbath where conscience only lurks in shadows. Led by a spiteful anti-hero and his entourage of misfits and cutthroats, this is a brilliant debut from Mark Lawrence in the never-enough genre of fantasy.

Aishling

So I finally finished this book after about 2 weeks. The main reason it took so long, was the writing style. I can only describe it as old vocabulary, very difficult to read for me. I had to read the same sentence more than once to understand it.

Aside from that the story was brilliant. I didn't even read the synopsis going into it so I was constantly surprised. All I'd known is that the main character was an anti-hero and that's exactly what I got.

If your a fan of game of thrones, I'd say you'd like this. I only compare the two as they are both written in a similarly old vocabulary and they're both pretty violent.

Sade A

"We play the game of thrones with pieces like Count Rener, pieces like your father. pieces like you, perhaps"
  

ummmmmm okkkkayyyyyyyyyyyy

Hands down one of the most underwhelming books and characters ever!!!!!! Like holy shit snacks, Jorg was supposed to be bad ass?? He was supposed to make your skin crawl??? Really??? Dude just sounded like a whiny brat.
  "oh the thorns, i can feel them holding me back, oh this guy is making sense but i don't want to hear it, might as well knife him."
 UGH!! I think the only part in this book that got a rise out of me was when he busted up that glass tree.. that was fun.

Also ugh, the whole flowery speech thing, 

  
    "Something tickled at me, the ghosts of whispers colder than the wind"...
  
 I sincerely think characters should only talk like this in an SJM's book or in a poetry book. Why are you rhyming?? and why was that door thing in chapter 33 talking like some sort of Terminator? 
"External sensors malfunctioning. Biometrics offline". Are you joking right now? Biometrics??? really?? biometrics???
Terminator door thingy: State your name and password
Jorg: Can you open the door i asked
Terminator door thingy: That information is classified. Do you have clearance??
LOL... these are people that are using the word feck and other old english and all of a sudden the author is throwing in biometrics, name and password and clearance?? really?? 
NAH UH


Also i have to tell you, i am thoroughly unconvinced that Jorg knew how to fight. So far everything was just plain luck or he fell down at the right time or a horse kicked him at the right time..

and really though what is this book about? Like what is the freaking empire? why is the empire broken? who broke the damn thing? Maybe the answers lie in the subsequent books but this was not good enough to make me want to step back into this world.


  All in all, this book doesn't cut it. Sticking a wannabe sadistic character in a book does not mean that book is going to magically turn into a good book.

BOOK ONE IN THE BROKEN EMPIRE TRILOGY “Prince of Thorns deserves attention as the work of an iconoclast who seems determined to turn that familiar thing, Medievalesque Fantasy Trilogy, entirely on its head.”—Locus When he was nine, he watched as his mother and brother were killed before him. By the time he was thirteen, he was the leader of a band of bloodthirsty thugs. By fifteen, he intends to be king... It’s time for Prince Honorous Jorg Ancrath to return to the castle he turned his back on, to take what’s rightfully his. Since the day he hung pinned on the thorns of a briar patch and watched Count Renar’s men slaughter his mother and young brother, Jorg has been driven to vent his rage. Life and death are no more than a game to him—and he has nothing left to lose. But treachery awaits him in his father’s castle. Treachery and dark magic. No matter how fierce his will, can one young man conquer enemies with power beyond his imagining?

Lauren

CW/TW for sexual assault. Prince of Thorns wants to be a grimdark anti-hero story and is unfortunately just an exhaustingly navel-gazey slog from the perspective of yet another snarky teen boy genius. Fourteen year old Prince Jorg leads a band of cutthroat outlaws and wants to become king by fifteen. Will he grow or change, face his own fatal flaws, or even face any kind of interesting obstacle in this book towards that goal? Nope, not really.
Presumably Jorg was supposed to eventually be relatable—not even likeable, but interesting, at all, in a human capacity—and just never was.
I wouldn't have finished it if I hadn't promised to read together with a friend who also didn't enjoy it. 
A month after reading a physical copy, I found out I'd owned it on Kindle already and DNFed it years ago without remembering. I'd put it down immediately after the first chapter's pointless shock factor sexual assault, apparently. 
I'm interested in reading dark stories that include difficult subjects, but to what end? Prince of Thorns didn't make any of its nasty attitude worth it. I would have been intrigued by a well-written, despicable character, but Jorg was frankly tiresome.
This review is coming around four years later because I'm /still/ baffled and annoyed by this book every time I remember I own it.

Elizabeth Neill

I had to make myself to finish this book :(

Francis Buggey

It was ok. Took me a while to finish it. It got incredibly good at the end which is exciting. debating if I want to read the other two.

** spoiler alert **
           Note from 2022: I wrote this review when I was 12 or something, and it's gotten a lot of views since then. I look back at it now expecting to cringe, but I honestly still agree with the spirit of what's been written, even if I would go about it a different way if I wrote it now. But for the sake of transparency, I guess I'll leave it how it is. It has seemed to resonate with some people, and made other people quite angry. I also think that author ML, beyond this initial debut series, has written some cool books and has gotten better (whether consciously having gotten similar feedback from elsewhere along the lines of what is mentioned in this review, or just bc his writing in general got better as he wrote more books — funny how those things kind of go together) with a lot of the issues that got me fired up back in 2011. I liked his Book of the Ancestors series and gave those good reviews on this site. Anyway, if you're still here to leave an angry comment in 2022... can I ask... why bother?

--

Cw: rape

Well, I did it. I finished it to the last page, mostly so I could review it like this. Give me a medal, because I was very much tempted to drop it when within the first few pages, the protagonist manages to rape two women and murder a few others just 'cause. More on this later.

This book was the metaphorical equivalent of some /r/morbidreality bullshit. Palahniuk pulls this shit too, but at least he does it well. Lazy writing. Lazy lazy lazy lazy lazy. It's like filming a trainwreck and presenting it unedited because Oh man look at it! It's Art! It's Edgy! But it's honestly lazy and ineffective and there's just way better stuff out there than this.

I am not protesting the use of rape as a plot device, however sickening I might find it personally. This book starts out with the plundering and burning of some small town in the country. Jorg is seen giving several less-than-stable orders to his men about what exactly they can do about the absence of material wealth, and points them in the way of several farm girls. Cue rape. Just 'cause. It's just so tiring to see men engage with sexual violence when it suits them as a rushed characterization job, then turn around and give the women in the book absolutely no agency or discernible personality. The two juxtaposed are just...so tiring, and utterly uninteresting. 

And why is it that every white male author writes shit like this literally for the sake of being edgy and cool? This was senseless, baseless — there was simply no point. Why am I expected to be sympathetic to the main character when he pulls shit like this?

There was a great quote I'm going to bring up that was directed at ASOIAF, but it will work here:
Tons of trolls have thrown out the “but THINGS WERE JUST LIKE THAT BACK THEN!” argument ad nauseum. Which is total bullshit, of course...

I just want to ask, why is it whenever producers/directors/writers want to demonstrate “gritty historic realism” it’s ALWAYS RAPE? It’s always sexual violence toward women/girls. 

You know what would be gritty historic realism? Dysentery. GoT has battles and armies marching all over the place. You want to show “what things were like back then”? Why aren’t we seeing 500 guys by the side of a road puking and shitting their guts out from drinking contaminated water while the rest of the army straggles along trying to keep going? Or a village getting wiped out by cholera? Or typhus, polio or plague epidemics?

I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND ANSWER WHY PEOPLE DON'T SEEM TO WANT TO DO THAT — No one wants to see that shit. Interesting. 

Anyway, let's move on to the other characters.

Wait. What other characters?

Jorg IS the main character, but, I mean, seriously, it's almost as if the most important supporting characters around him were just plot devices in living flesh and bone and nothing more. No development. Totally flat. Lifeless. Existing to only complement the already-gritty-edgy-omgimsocool vibe of the main character. Don't they get any development? At all? 

Another point — one redeeming part of this book could have been female representation, but... what did you DO to Katherine, for fuck's sake?

We have her stand there as Jorg starts to strangle her near the end. That's what you do to her. Here we have that recurring motif of violence against women, where every girl is either raped or beaten and don't exist in this insipid, too-edgy plot in their own right. 

In case you couldn't figure it out, I do not recommend this book.

Christian Huss

This is probably the most amazing dark fantasy novel that I have read all year! The story follows the young Prince Jorg on his quest for revenge. This teen anti-hero is quick witted and has an agenda that will cause the entire empire to fall to its knees. Jorg seems to view the world and its contents as grand pieces in a large game of chess and he will stop at nothing until the one man who killed his mother and brother is erased from the face of earth. However, Jorg is unaware that he may be just another pawn in a game with a much darker force moving the pieces. I absolutely can't wait to read the next installment in the series!

Nat Welch

I really enjoyed this book. Good mixture of dark humor, tragedy and fantasy.

Aleena Korell

“Tell me, tutor,' I said. 'Is revenge a science, or an art?”

If you want to like your protagonist... then I maybe wouldn't recommend The Broken Empire series.
If you want to love your protagonist with a stubborn but entirely irrational love even as you read of him murdering someone, again, in his pursuit of his revenge and his crown, then this is the book for you.

Jorg may be my favorite narrator. Ever. A philosophical, rather murderous, Plutarch-loving, revenge-seeking and-- though diabolical-- quite self-aware fourteen year old who speaks/acts/leads like a 35 year old. Except he leads like no other leader would have the courage (lack of sanity?) to-- with no holds barred, no sacrifices he would not be willing to make. And that's no exaggeration. His intelligence and self-assessing, not to mention his love for his dead little brother and of course his wit and lighthearted quips, make him seem like he might just be redeemable-- if he wants to be. He doesn't. 
....Or does he?

Jorg, you terrifying, maniacal little warrior genius. I shouldn't love you, but I do.

Tom Turner

Having read The Book of the Ancestor series last year and absolutely l loved them, I was hesitant to read The Broken Empire. Tried was because I was lead to believe that BOA was a step up from BE. So I assumed I would be disappointed. What clicked with me and made me take the plunge was reading that Mark Lawrence based Jorg, our brutal protagonist on Alex from Anthony Burges' A Clockwork Orange. I had also heard that the reason why people didn't consider it as good as BOA was that they couldn't connect to study a horrible protagonist. It would be interesting to know, had I read Prince of Thorns without knowing this tidbit of trivia, whether I would have fallen into the trap of misunderstanding this book as others had. But I do definitely feel that this knowledge greatly enhanced my understanding and therefore enjoyment of the book. I would even go as far as saying I might even like it better than BOA, and that's saying something!

celeste

i reread this because i wanted to finish this trilogy but now i don't think i'm interested in continuing. the book bored me, the magic system is vague and confusing, the constant repetition of 'when you play the game of thrones' feels straight outta ASOIAF, and the characters are not interesting me. should i stay for jorg and because this series is grimdark? meh i don't think that's enough for me.

Igor Medeiros

Um personagem que não me conquistou, então terminar a história não foi tão fácil assim.

Daniela V.

"(...)Hate will keep you alive where love fails..."

Prince of Thorns is the first book of The Broken Empire trilogy. It's a character-driven fantasy book set on a post-apocalyptic Europe. I think it's very challenging for a fantasy book to be set on the future when the majority of them take us back to the Medieval Era.

As I stated before, the story is driven by the main character, Jorg Ancrath. He is a prince that has escaped his castle and what is left of his family. He is full of hatred because his mother and his little brother were brutally murdered by Count Renar, four years earlier, while Jorg was watching hanging in a briar thorn bush. Those scars have apparently marked him for life.

The story is told from the perspective of thirteen-year old Jorg, leader of a band of outlaws and some chapters work as flashbacks to tell us what happened 4 years ago.

If you are looking for a heroe, don't read this book. Jorg Ancrath is prince, king and emperor of anti-heroes. He destroys things, he murders people, he rapes women. Although, at the end of the book we get to question all of that. It is a complex story, there are lots of magic, so everything must be questioned. I don't want to give away much information so I'll stop talking and put a quote:

"(...)You’re a piece in somebody else’s game, and all you’ll earn from it is a sword through the stomach, unless you redeem yourself in the next twenty seconds..."

Overall, it's an amazing story, but a few things didn't work out for me. The secondary characters are mildly developed. I've already started the second book of the series, so I can tell you the development gets better.

But my main concern is the lack of information on how this future world turned into an almost medieval one again, how the Empire broke and what really happened the Day of a Thousand Suns. At the beginning of the book I was very disoriented because of this, but some of the last chapters give us an insight in some of these situations.

Also, I liked the duality of Jorg at the end of the book, and I really think we'll encounter someone very different on the second book. And also, a man of eighteen, so maybe my problem trying to figure out how a boy of thirteen could do the things he did won't be an issue anymore.

"(...)Blood is on these hands, these ink-stained hands, but I don’t feel the sin. I think maybe we die every day. Maybe we’re born new each dawn, a little changed, a little further on our own road. When enough days stand between you and the person you were, you’re strangers. Maybe that’s what growing up is. Maybe I have grown up..."

So read it without judgement and enjoy the wonderful prose of Mark Lawrence.

Beta Febrianita

"Hate will keep you alive where love fails."

When he was nine, he watched as his mother and brother were killed before him. By the time he was thirteen, he was the leader of a band of bloodthirsty thugs. By fifteen, he intends to be a king.

Well if those alone can't make you read this book, let me give you another reason, Jorg Ancrath. The first few chapters paint a picture of a young boy, a heartless fourteen year old runaway prince with his band of ragged bloodthirsty thugs intend on burning, killing people and raping women. But deeper into the book, you begin to discover layers behind his persona. He's one of the most complicated character I've read, one minute you want to kiss him, and the next you just want to throttle him dead. 

This book solely depends on Jorg, Jorg being a heartless killing machine, and him showing mercy and compassion. It's like a full swing emotion pendulum reading this book.

"I looked into my own darkness. I knew what it was to be trapped, and to watch ruination. Each day the memories weigh a little heavier. Each day they drag you down that bit further. You wind them around you, a single thread at a time, and you weave your own shroud, you build a cocoon, and in it madness grows.” 

Oh right, the sweet revenge. It's a really slooooww process getting there, but what I truly love about this book is how Jorg stops at nothing to gain his goal. First, his rightful throne, and finally his revenge.
And his ways of doing things blow my mind.

"Tell me, tutor, is revenge a science or an art?"

Lorien O'Brien

Giulia 

#medievalathon

Era esattamente quello che mi serviva dopo una lettura mediocre (per non dire di peggio). In alcune parti non si capisce molto bene cosa succede, ma personalmente adoro gli anti-heroes quindi per me non c'è stato nessun dubbio sul rating *-*. 

Sono molto curiosa di sapere come continuerà la storia :D

Prince of thorns

Reviews

Highlights