Byung-Chul Han

Alain Badiou

An argument that love requires the courage to accept self-negation for the sake of discovering the Other.

The Agony of Eros

A difficult text, perhaps I would rate it higher if I understood better. Philosophy is something I'm aspiring to read more of. 

I agreed with what I understood the cheapening and elimination of Eros in a capitalistic society. The Zizekian examples were helpful when not fully into the depths of Hegel etc. 

BC Hark

A difficult text, perhaps I would rate it higher if I understood better. Philosophy is something I'm aspiring to read more of. 

I agreed with what I understood the cheapening and elimination of Eros in a capitalistic society. The Zizekian examples were helpful when not fully into the depths of Hegel etc. 

Challenging! 

spot on commentary on data-driven corpse society like today, but kind of difficult to read without prior reading of other philosophers such heidegger, hegel, plato, kafka and the likes. the endnote just pointed out on which material but not explaining anything.

solitones

Elena Kuran

Favorite chapters: Being Able Not to be Able- “Today, love is being positivized into a formula for enjoyment” (reminds me of jonathan richman’s when we refuse to suffer) and The End of Theory- “Thinking, in the strong sense, begins with eros. To be able to think, one must first have been a friend, a lover. Without eros, thinking loses all vitality and turmoil, and becomes repetitive and reactive”

jess

the idea to accept one's every negation and self-abject before succumbing to the Other was that of a beautiful one — reminiscent of Lispector's notion from An Apprenticeship or The Book of Pleasures, but this one with elongated derivatives and of its looping repertoire that drags on even in this slim and compact book. the attempt of that idea is elucidated, but barely reaching this ultimatum in abridging the very idea it is trying to represent. solid 3

An argument that love requires the courage to accept self-negation for the sake of discovering the Other. Byung-Chul Han is one of the most widely read philosophers in Europe today, a member of the new generation of German thinkers that includes Markus Gabriel and Armen Avanessian. In The Agony of Eros, a bestseller in Germany, Han considers the threat to love and desire in today's society. For Han, love requires the courage to accept self-negation for the sake of discovering the Other. In a world of fetishized individualism and technologically mediated social interaction, it is the Other that is eradicated, not the self. In today's increasingly narcissistic society, we have come to look for love and desire within the “inferno of the same.” Han offers a survey of the threats to Eros, drawing on a wide range of sources—Lars von Trier's film Melancholia, Wagner's Tristan und Isolde, Fifty Shades of Grey, Michel Foucault (providing a scathing critique of Foucault's valorization of power), Martin Buber, Hegel, Baudrillard, Flaubert, Barthes, Plato, and others. Han considers the “pornographication” of society, and shows how pornography profanes eros; addresses capitalism's leveling of essential differences; and discusses the politics of eros in today's “burnout society.” To be dead to love, Han argues, is to be dead to thought itself. Concise in its expression but unsparing in its insight, The Agony of Eros is an important and provocative entry in Han's ongoing analysis of contemporary society. This remarkable essay, an intellectual experience of the first order, affords one of the best ways to gain full awareness of and join in one of the most pressing struggles of the day: the defense, that is to say—as Rimbaud desired it—the “reinvention” of love. —from the foreword by Alain Badiou

The Agony of Eros

Reviews