Flowers in the Attic

Great read before I watch the version on TV. I remember my mum reading this book in the eighties

disturbing af but admittedly excellent

this book was absolutely heartbreaking. i did see some of the twists coming, but the impact still was felt when they discovered the betrayal they had experienced. 

also, fuck whoever thinks this is a "forbidden love story." you make me sick. 

this book was absolutely heartbreaking. i did see some of the twists coming, but the impact still was felt when they discovered the betrayal they had experienced.

also, fuck whoever thinks this is a "forbidden love story." you make me sick.

😟 this is fudged man😟 poor kids could not catch a break:(

Flowers in the Attic does not deserve the reputation it has. First, I expected to be morally outraged. I was not. Second, I expected it to be campy. It was not. If one of the purposes of young adult novels is to instruct young people in how to approach, understand, and interpret literature, then Flowers in the Attic is a primer for gothic fiction, and is, in that way, successful.

Reread: still a very haunting and strange read. It doesn't sit well because it contains incest, religious trauma, a mother hiding and even trying to get rid of her children, etc. But it is fascinating to see the characters mature despite living for years in an attic with no contact with the outside world. The foreword by Gillian Flynn captures the intrigue of this book perfectly: "What kept me circling around to the beginning was that hyper-Gothic female evil. The emotionally cold, physically abusive grandmother. The cloying, manipulative, mind-warping mother. It felt so new and stunning to me--these witches who seemed quite real. I devoured the sequels less to learn about Cath's tragic love story than to see what kind of woman Cathy became -- princess, witch, a bit of both?--and what she'd do with all those awful urges she inherited." Other quotes: - When you grow up, and have a million adult things to do, you forget how long a day can be for a child. -She even had the money to buy a much younger man to love, and sleep with--and what did Chris and I have but broken dreams, shattered promises, and unending frustrations? And what did the twins have, but a dollhouse and a mouse and ever-declining health? -There is no hate such as that born out of love betrayed--and my brain screamed out for revenge.

I simply do not know what stars to give this. Beautifully written but intensely noncey.

** spoiler alert ** The book I have read recently and chosen to review is called Flowers in the Attic, written by Virginia Andrews in the 1970s. It is a gothic novel set in the 1950s in Pennsylvania. This book, followed by the main character Cathy's point of view, shows how the Dollangager family's life fell apart as their father died in a car accident. Their mother Corrine, with her four children aged 14, 12, 4 and 4 years old, has no money and has to move them all into her rich parents' home far away in the middle of the night. They have to leave all their belongings at their old home except for once suitcase of clothes. Due to uncontrollable circumstances, the children have to be locked and hidden in the attic and never seen - in her childhood, their mother had done something to anger her father so much that he wrote her out of the will. If he found out she had children his hatred would deepen even more. As she slowly tries to win back her father's approval, the mother forgets how much she once adored her children and starts to forget them, whilst their grandmother abuses them. This novel has a lot of dark themes such as incest, rape, murder, death, betrayal, deception, loss, grief and hopelessness, which may not be suitable for some. However, I would recommend this book to people aged over 14 because it is original, interesting, written well and leaves a lasting impression. It is a thriller novel that always urges you to keep on reading. Here is an excerpt from the book: 'It is so appropriate to colour hope yellow, like that sun we seldom saw. And as I begin to copy from the old memorandum journals that I kept for so long, a title comes as if inspired. Open the Window and Stand in the Sunshine. Yet, I hesitate to name our story that for I think of us more as flowers in the attic. Paper flowers. Born so brightly coloured, and fading duller through all those long, grim, dreary, nightmarish days when we were held prisoners of hope, and kept captives by greed. But, we were never to colour even one of our paper blossoms yellow.' The book's main theme is betrayal because the children were betrayed by the person who they once gave all their trust. These children must learn how to adapt to their new environment and how to take care of themselves as the years go by.

First V.C Andrews book I read all because a friend told me about it since it was on her summer reading list when we were starting high school. Read summer of 1997.

Flowers in the Attic by Virginia Andrews I was recommended this by a ten year old. It's not something I'd normally go for, but it was cheap on Amazon so I thought I'd give it a go. It was a good read and it didn't take me long to get emotionally invested with the characters. I want to read the rest of them now.

i dont ever want to read anything like this in my life ever again

I'm rating this a 3 but it is actually more like a 3.4. I heard two ways this book was generally described: as a weirdo incest sex romp and as a story of progressively escalating child abuse. It definitely ended up being the latter. There was a grand total of one sex scene in this book. The rest of it was about four children growing up locked in an attic for four years. The thing that strikes me the most is I bet this actually happens, or easily can - if I was 12 and my mom told me that we'd have to just stay in an attic "for one night" I would believe her, and I can see myself continuing to believe her as one day turned to a week, or months, or years and you just got conditioned to being there. As for the incest angle - definitely not as porny as some reviews made it sound. The 12 year old protagonist is stuck in an attic with her 14 year old brother (plus two 4 year old twin siblings). They are in there long enough for both of the older children to go through puberty and stuff happens. The feelings of reluctant-attraction-slash-sexual-tension are described in some detail and there is some kissing and stuff, but like I said, a grand total of one (really bad) sex scene. There is nothing very risque about it (then again apparently many people read this in middle school? Maybe it was a little more shocking at that age). The main plot of the book and the most memorable thing about it is the transformation of their mother from a loving parent to an abusive monster (view spoiler)[who apparently tries to murder them and succeeds with one of the twins (hide spoiler)], an illustration of how a kid could actually end up in this kind of situation, and the coming of age of a couple of kids.

The beginning of the story hits you hard, showing you a loving family before tearing them apart with the death of the father. The children and their mother are off to live with grandparents who are apparently very rich. Only to find out they are instantly hated by the grandmother, the only of the two grandparents to even know of their existence.  They are kept in the attic room, not allowed to roam anywhere else. Truly a very bleak and horrible way to spend time. We learn just how horrible the grandmother is, the only member that the children have contact with besides their mother on occasion. There is a growing sense of unease as time passes and the Dollanganger children are still left in the attic, their mom carrying on a more normal life. We see how the kids adjust to their living quarters,, how they make the best out of a bad situation.. Sure she does on them when when can,but it just isn't the same. It doesn't sit right. As a parent I just can't picture her not doing everything in her power to get her kids free of the attic as soon as possible. A truly gut wrenching and horrid secret comes to light and it leaves the reader completely shocked and horrified. So many emotions are felt in the last several chapters.

¿Que decir? Me gustó el libro, lo quería leer desde hace mucho mucho tiempo por razones personales (alguien que quería le gustaba mucho) pero ya había visto las dos peliculas y no lo sé... sentí que podría haber sido diferente. Más emocionante tal vez, las cosas que pasaban era debiles, como que sin fuerza. El final no tiene fuerza, se escapan tan fácil que te da bronca. Uno se queda como "PERO PERO... TAN FACIL?". Entiendo en el abuso mental que tenían estos jovenes para no salir de su cuarto pero... no lo sé, esperaba más. Lo "romantico" no me gustó, realmente me sonó forzado. Esperaba un romance mucho mejor, más desarrollado teniendo en cuenta la gravedad del asunto. Así que nada, no fue decepcionante pero estaba MUCHO más.

What did I just read? That was disturbing, and a complete mind-f***. But it was so good!!! Such a tragic story. So many tears I had!

Drama, incesto, secretos y mucha plata en juego. Las sagas familiares son mi debilidad y no podía no leer este clásico de culto. Pasen a echarle un vistazo a mi reseña en el canal. Link al video: https://youtu.be/MjTKdWcRd2Q

I started reading this because my friend picked it up. I won't judge them for their choices, they probably just wanted to read a work of horror, but the book in question... ugh. Why I hated reading this book: 1. No self-awareness coupled with bad execution - This book contains taboo subjects and utilizes them like a toddler throwing darts of a truck. Edgy stories can be great, but this one has horrible morals that make no sense, is written like a telenovela, and then acts like it's appropriate for teens. One moment you will see something not age-appropriate and another a character saying "Golly-lolly that's terrible! Gosh!". Why is this written? You can say it's to show how abuse works, but for that, there are far better stories. You can say that you have to consider the timeframe this book was released in, but that means, it did not stand the test of time. 2. Bad character voices - The kids, especially in the beginning, while being aged 12 and 14, speak like the elderly trying to get up the chair. Should I assume that reading a lot of books and being locked up for a little while made them that way? No, books don't do that and they had plenty of time outside before. Their parents sound more youthful, why can't the kids? There's plenty of contradictions and leaps of logic they make which is common in abusive relationships, but here their struggles feel more like plot devices to delay the inevitable and drag out the story. They give up their strong convictions as fast as a bullet train when they need to. 3. Dull narration - The main character narrates the story. You can excuse her bad storytelling by saying she's 12, but regardless of the intention, the book is still dull and unenjoyable. She spends a long time on descriptions of objects, throws way too many adjectives, and tells irrelevant plot details. Some amusing things: *She spoke with her brother and told him that this method of long narration is more immersive and made him use it, he was narrating his story fine before. *In the prologue, the narrator compares herself to Charles Dickens and boasts that her craft has a lot more sweat, tears, and blood, she also calls him her favorite author, so it's hard to understand her intention, just like the intentions of this book overall. Because of the narration, it's hard to even laugh at how horrible the writing is. If an editor looked through this book, it would become a pamphlet. 4. Terrible pacing - Time passes and it never feels satisfying. Certain characters disappear for long stretches of time, even if they are there every day according to the story. A lot of scenes could be shorter or avoided. The drama and the quiet are not balanced, the first part of the book goes on forever with barely any drama. 5. Toxic masculinity - The narrator just has to comment on her mom's swelling breasts, her figure, which makes her into a woman according to her. She also comments on her sister's panties in detail, I get that taking care of children can be gross, but maybe keep it to a few sentences, nobody wants to know about the ruffles on your sister's panties. Her brother can't keep hands to himself either, he wants his woman to be without a flaw, to not abandon him even when he's deep in debt and lost all his money. He can describe them as bad as her. As the book goes along it gets worse, the peak is blaming the rape victims for being too seductive. Redeeming points that I tried to find: 1. Not gatekeeping art - The author is an artist and she clearly doesn't believe in talent, but skill and hard work. Most people can do it if they try long enough. 2. Somewhat trying to educate you, a little - There are references to other books and there's random trivia that's thrown sometimes. . . . Ye, this is just bad djshahdhsadhashd

I started reading this because my friend picked it up. I won't judge them for their choices, they probably just wanted to read a work of horror, but the book in question... ugh. Why I hated reading this book: 1. No self-awareness coupled with bad execution - This book contains taboo subjects and utilizes them like a toddler throwing darts of a truck. Edgy stories can be great, but this one has horrible morals that make no sense, is written like a telenovela, and then acts like it's appropriate for teens. One moment you will see something not age-appropriate and another a character saying "Golly-lolly that's terrible! Gosh!". Why is this written? You can say it's to show how abuse works, but for that, there are far better stories. You can say that you have to consider the timeframe this book was released in, but that means, it did not stand the test of time. 2. Bad character voices - The kids, especially in the beginning, while being aged 12 and 14, speak like the elderly trying to get up the chair. Should I assume that reading a lot of books and being locked up for a little while made them that way? No, books don't do that and they had plenty of time outside before. Their parents sound more youthful, why can't the kids? There's plenty of contradictions and leaps of logic they make which is common in abusive relationships, but here their struggles feel more like plot devices to delay the inevitable and drag out the story. They give up their strong convictions as fast as a bullet train when they need to. 3. Dull narration - The main character narrates the story. You can excuse her bad storytelling by saying she's 12, but regardless of the intention, the book is still dull and unenjoyable. She spends a long time on descriptions of objects, throws way too many adjectives, and tells irrelevant plot details. Some amusing things: *She spoke with her brother and told him that this method of long narration is more immersive and made him use it, he was narrating his story fine before. *In the prologue, the narrator compares herself to Charles Dickens and boasts that her craft has a lot more sweat, tears, and blood, she also calls him her favorite author, so it's hard to understand her intention, just like the intentions of this book overall. Because of the narration, it's hard to even laugh at how horrible the writing is. If an editor looked through this book, it would become a pamphlet. 4. Terrible pacing - Time passes and it never feels satisfying. Certain characters disappear for long stretches of time, even if they are there every day according to the story. A lot of scenes could be shorter or avoided. The drama and the quiet are not balanced, the first part of the book goes on forever with barely any drama. 5. Toxic masculinity - The narrator just has to comment on her mom's swelling breasts, her figure, which makes her into a woman according to her. She also comments on her sister's panties in detail, I get that taking care of children can be gross, but maybe keep it to a few sentences, nobody wants to know about the ruffles on your sister's panties. Her brother can't keep hands to himself either, he wants his woman to be without a flaw, to not abandon him even when he's deep in debt and lost all his money. He can describe them as bad as her. As the book goes along it gets worse, the peak is blaming the rape victims for being too seductive. Redeeming points that I tried to find: 1. Not gatekeeping art - The author is an artist and she clearly doesn't believe in talent, but skill and hard work. Most people can do it if they try long enough. 2. Somewhat trying to educate you, a little - There are references to other books and there's random trivia that's thrown sometimes. . . . Ye, this is just bad djshahdhsadhashd

I was not prepared the short emotional roller coaster that was this book. A young girl, loving and trusting her mother through the painful loss of her father, is tragically turned against her as she and her siblings are hidden away in an attic to wilt like flowers without the sun. Something that continually haunts me is the naive, simple thoughts of a twelve year old girl slowly beginning to realize that the mother she loved was, in fact, a shallow liar. The emotional journey she and her siblings undergo as they cope with entrapment is something that grips the reader, to the point that I didn't really want to put it down and finished it in about a day. The only reason it didn't get five stars was because it was hard to stretch my imagination to believe that the children had rarely thought of escape before the time they did. Especially since the grandmother was supposedly so horrid. I also found it hard to believe the scene where a sibling offers for another to drink his own blood, as if that were something that would pop into a child's head like it was normal. Otherwise it is definitely a good read, just know that there is some incest and some rather grotesque scenes, as this is definitely more on the horror side of fiction.

It was the best book I have read in a very LONG time

Wow. So I was aware that this book had a reputation for being disturbing. Honestly, that is kinda why I picked it up, lol! Well, it certainly lived up to that reputation. What I wasn't expecting was that it was also very well written. I don't know why I had assumef it would be subpar, but it definitely was not! Excellent read and I will definitely be continuing with this series.

I read this in like 7th grade & it blew my young mind out of the water. I can appreciate as someone that is now wiser, the impact in literature. I would call this a cult classic if not a modern classic since a lot of Andrews' story structure is seen a lot in current times. This is a story about a seemingly perfect family fractured by a tragedy and a now widowed single mother having to figure out how to survive without a husband to depend on. There is no happy ending and a lot of f*cked up shit goes on that not many readers care for but truth hurts. It's very interesting on a psycological & biological level - you just have to get past the knee jerk distaste.

This book is thoroughly screwed up. The father dies, the mom doesn't work, and so the family moves in with their grandparents. But if anyone finds out that the mother has four kids than she won't inherit her dying parents huge fortune. So the mother and the grandmother lock the 4 kids up in a room that connects up to the attic that they're never allowed to leave. The grandmother brings them food (view spoiler)[in the morning that consists of donuts with arsenic on them. (hide spoiler)] The eldest daughter and son (view spoiler)[start a sexual relationship (hide spoiler)]. Basically the entire book is "what the f*ck, did that seriously just happen?" and my poor innocent mind read this in 6th grade. The only reason I remembered reading this series was because I went to the movies and saw a trailer for this book's adaptation and had some PTSD-type flashbacks... who the hell wants to see this as a movie?