
Reviews

Audre Lorde had a unique way about words—so evocative, deeply cutting. Her intersectional feminism is so ahead of its time, or just showing we sadly haven’t moved the needle enough.

reading lorde is like coming home, getting ready for a battle full of compassion, care, anger, all the unspoken things, it feels like giving up solitude, yet leaning in to it.

collections like this one - of works fundamental for understanding contemporary intersectional feminism and understanding black women - are difficult to review. one some levels, suffice it to say that the writing demands to be read and re-read and memorised to the point i was itching to go and by my own copy so i can underline and annotate (how funny that only some books are worthy of this). on another, i am a white woman audre lorde's work was never for nor about me but i would not have been a whole person without it regardless. in that aspect, lorde is an invaluable voice to be heard and to be listened to. one - a feminist, an activist - cannot truly understand and practise intersectionality if they do not hear the voices that have historically be silent, and uplift them. it is important to recognise our different experiences and not simply close our eyes for them but support our sisters in their unique struggles. works from lorde's essays that will particularly stick with me, i think, are 'the transformation of silence into language and action', 'poetry is not a luxury', 'uses of the erotic' and 'age, race, class and sex: women redefining difference'. the thought that you must speak up, even if you are afraid of suffering, as you will suffer regardless - that struck me particularly deeply. as for her poetry, i am a poor poetry reader but i found 'martha', 'a litany for survival', 'afterimages' and 'need' very evocative and impactful.

A book everyone should make time to read








Highlights

To grow up metabolising hatred like daily bread means that eventually every human interaction becomes tainted with the negative passion and intensity of its by-products — anger and cruelty.

Only within a patriarchal structure is maternity the only social power open to women.

For we have been socialised to respect fear more than our own needs for language and definition, and while we wait in silence for that final luxury of fearlessness, the weight of that silence will choke us.

Because the machine will try to grind you into dust anyway, whether or not we speak. We can sit in our corners mute forever while our sisters and our selves are wasted, while our children are distorted and destroyed, while our earth is poisoned; we can sit in our safe corners mute as bottles, and we will still be no less afraid.

The sharing of joy, whether physical, emotional, psychic, or intellectual, forms a bridge between the sharers which can be the basis for understanding much of what is not shared between them, and lessens the threat of their difference.

Revolution is not a one-time event. It is becoming always vigilant for the smallest opportunity to make a ways genuine change in established, outgrown responses; for instance, it is learning to address each other's difference with respect.

There is no such thing as a single-issue struggle because we do not live single-issue lives.

Sometimes we could not bear the face of each other's differences because of what we feared those differences might say about ourselves. As if everybody can't eventually be too Black, too white too man, too woman. But any future vision which can encompass all of us, by definition, must be complex and expanding, not easy to achieve. The answer to cold is heat. the answer to hunger is food. But there is no simple monolithic solution to racism, to sexism, to homophobia.

I am not free while any woman is unfree, even when her shackles are very different from my own. And I am not free as long as one person of colour remains chained. Nor is any one of you.

If the younger members of a community view the older members as contemptible or suspect or excess, they will never be able to join hands and examine the living memories of the community, nor ask the all important question, Why?' This gives rise to a historical amnesia that keeps us working to invent the wheel every time we have to go to the store for bread.

Of all the art forms, poetry is the most economical. It is the one which is the most secret, which requires the least physical labour, the least material, and the one which can be done between shifts, in the hospital pantry, on the subway, and on scraps of surplus paper.

Somewhere, on the edge of consciousness, there is what I call a mythical norm, which each one of us within our heart knows: "That is not me. In america, this norm is usually defined as white, thin, male, young, heterosexual, Christian and financially secure. It is with this mythical norm that the trappings of power reside within this society. Those of us who stand outside that power often identify one way in which we are different, and we assume that to be the primary cause of all oppression, forgetting other distortions around difference, some of which we ourselves may be practising. By and large within the women's movement today, white women focus upon their oppression as women and ignore differences of race, sexual pref- erence, class and age. There is a pretense to a homogeneity of experience covered by the word sisterhood that does not in fact exist.

Certainly there are very real differences between us of race, age and sex. But it is not those differences between us that are separating us. It is rather our refusal to recognise those differences, and to examine the distortions which result from our misnaming them and their effects upon human behaviour and expectation.

Because we cannot fight old power in old power terms only. The only way we can do it is by creating another whole structure that touches every aspect of our existence, at the same time as we are resisting.

Within the interdependence of mutual (nondominant) differences lies that security which enables us to descend into the chaos of knowledge and return with true visions of our future, along with the concomitant power to effect those changes which can bring that future into being. Difference is that raw and powerful connection from which our personal power is forged.

Advocating the mere tolerance of difference between women is the grossest reformism. It is a total denial of the Creative function of difference in our lives. Difference must be not merely tolerated, but seen as a fund of necessary polarities between which our creativity can spark like a dialectic.

The supposition that one sex needs the other's acquiescence in order to exist prevents both from moving together as self-defined persons towards a common goal.

For there are no new ideas. There are only new ways of making them felt - of examining what those ideas feel like being lived on Sunday morning at 7 a.m., after brunch, during wild love, making war, giving birth, mourning our dead - while we suffer the old longings, battle the old warnings and fears of being silent and impotent and alone, while we taste new possibilities and strengths.

The white fathers told us: I think, therefore I am. The Black mother within each of us the poet whispers in our dreams: I feel, therefore I can be free