But what If We're Wrong? Thinking about the Present as If it Were the Past
But What If We're Wrong? visualizes the contemporary world as it will appear to those who'll perceive it as the distant past. Chuck Klosterman asks questions that are profound in their simplicity: How certain are we about our understanding of gravity? How certain are we about our understanding of time? What will be the defining memory of rock music, five hundred years from today? How seriously should we view the content of our dreams? How seriously should we view the content of television? Are all sports destined for extinction? Is it possible that the greatest artist of our era is currently unknown (or--weirder still--widely known, but entirely disrespected)? Is it possible that we "overrate" democracy? And perhaps most disturbing, is it possible that we've reached the end of knowledge? Kinetically slingshotting through a broad spectrum of objective and subjective problems, But What If We're Wrong? is built on interviews with a variety of creative thinkers--George Saunders, David Byrne, Jonathan Lethem, Kathryn Schulz, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Brian Greene, Junot Díaz, Amanda Petrusich, Ryan Adams, Nick Bostrom, Dan Carlin, and Richard Linklater, among others--interwoven with the type of high-wire humor and nontraditional analysis only Klosterman would dare to attempt. It's a seemingly impossible achievement: a book about the things we cannot know, explained as if we did. It's about how we live now, once "now" has become "then."
Reviews
Patrick Book@patrickb
A. D. Knapp@haselrig
Mariane Ferrantino @marfer
Michael Stuckey@funkmasterstuck
Max Bodach@maxbodach
Sloan, Kara@kayraw
Zoe Smolen@booksatlunch
Jason @jmp
Brian Cotie@bcotie
Mathieu Schwab@mogwarts
Helen Bright@lemonista
Mat Connor@mconnor
Rasmus@rasse
Jayme Cochrane@jamesco
Michael Ernst@beingernst
Kyle Curry@kcurry24
Traci Wilbanks@traci
John Lopiano Jr.@jlopiano44
ian alas@ian
Albert Dong@albertdong23
kody probst@kodypro
McKlayne Marshall@mcklayne
Jen@fierycracker81
alina s@asupernova