
Nadja
Reviews

so agonizing to read. a pure objectification; an apparent elucidation of a muse in the eyes of a man, in spite of the sentimentality he owns towards Nadja, eventually neglects here and proceed to commemorate a form of memorial, these letters, to her, while also completely treating her like an absolute, mere object of his desire, of the muse to his surrealist artistry he holds so proudly of. to the end of the book there’s a despicable awareness of how the emphasis of himself as a being of desire was irrevocably, inevitably human and wrong, but slides it off with the attenuation of his art as a proof of his dis-neglect: this book, a dedication of her, to him was the most he could do: a dispel of his desire for Nadja and instead convict this book to become an altar of worship for her, where as the matter of fact it was actually the contradiction, of how despicably disintegrating to see Nadja being portrayed as a mere frail, fragile woman, and forever serve to him as a muse for his art. despite the romanticism and poetic power of its prose, its narrative, and also the consideration of how it was a norm back in his days, it is, for me, so agonizing that it dispels his oeuvre that supposedly incredibly romantic and beautiful. to me, it’s just not.

to be fair this is 3.5 stars but what can i say, i’m a romantic.




















