Lilly polansky

Probably more of a 3.5 but I’m rounding up. I was so intrigued when I first saw this premise but what really made me wanna read this book was that very painting like beautiful cover. And this one has definitely surprised me. I’ve read only a few short stories and other works which are written in second person, and I have come to distinctly associate it with N. K. Jemisin. But it was such a surprise to see such creative use of this writing style in this novella. While the story itself stays close to the premise that is mentioned on GR, the way the author goes about it is very unique and really did have me thinking hard on trying to connect the dots. It’s all a one sided conversation with many many unusual characters, and we have to rely on the shaky and unreliable memories of these people to try and figure out what’s going on. We don’t get the protagonist’s POV at all, so it was very interesting to try and get to understand her motivations. There is also an underlying theme about revolution, what happens after it is successful, are the legends that are borne out of it always truthful or merely exaggerated, and do the general public really need to know the actual truth or just the manufactured one that keeps them content. It’s also very interesting to see how memories change over time, what and how we try to remember them and what it really says about us. To conclude though, despite all this interesting stuff, I wasn’t satisfied with the story and would have preferred if it was a longer book so that we could have gotten to know the world a little more and just gotten more answers in general. The ending is also slightly open ended and I’m not usually a fan. However, I would still recommend this novella just to experience something so fascinating and singular.

Although storytelling here was unique for me and the prose was good, I found it confusing. The main character here is Manet, which you will see through the eyes of the other characters she comes across with. Each chapter has a different point of view - few recurring and never from Manet- and context. This was a very different approach to tell a story for me, and also the reason I wasn’t able to enjoy this as much. It prevented me from creating a clear picture of the world in my head, it made me feel detached from the plot and the characters. Everything was passive, I only got to know what’s happened once it was done and not while it was actually happening so I felt like I missed all the action.

5 stars. The story structure is clever and unlike any other book I've read. Each chapter is essentially a one-sided transcript of Manet's conversation with a different character as she investigates a mysterious locket, and her own past, with increasing peril. The different settings, and Manet herself, are only revealed by inference; we don't hear her questions, only the answers. Again and again, her search for truth only exposes the many ways it can become twisted and obfuscated. The audiobook narrator, Barrie Kreinik, did a fantastic job of differentiating character voices and accents. This was really helpful, as in some chapters Manet interacts with more than one person and otherwise it would've been harder to follow who was speaking. I'm glad I also had the physical book available, as some details were less confusing when I went back to re-read them. The plot is intentionally tricky to follow and its conclusion may be unsatisfying to some, but I think the ending is well-suited to the nature of the story.